Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
книги / 665.pdf
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
07.06.2023
Размер:
7.85 Mб
Скачать

Global EV Outlook 2019 5. Challenges and solutions for EV deployment

 

 

 

 

without direct individual user

 

incentivise aggregated demand-side

 

 

 

 

interaction.

 

resources.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EVs can also feed electricity back to the

 

 

Pricing of flexibility services needs to

 

 

Level 3 – Bi-

 

 

grid and home. This allows for the use

 

 

exceed the increased cost for the EV

 

 

 

 

of EVs as a distributed electricity

 

 

owner of bi-directional charging. Bi-

 

 

directional charging

 

 

storage mechanism, and enhances the

 

 

directional charging requirements may

 

 

 

 

 

attractiveness for EVs as a frequency

 

 

be included in the standardisation of

 

 

 

 

 

response measure.

 

 

EVSE and EVs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The enhanced flexibility capacities of

 

Aggregators need to be allowed as a

 

Level 4 –

 

 

market player, benefits from bi-

 

 

EVs are managed by aggregators to be

 

 

Aggregated bi-

 

 

directional flexibility should be

 

 

able to compete in the flexibility market

 

 

directional charging

 

 

rewarded through electricity market

 

 

with larger capacities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

dynamics.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: EVSE = electric vehicle supply equipment; DSO = distribution system operator; CPO = charging point operator. Sources: IEA analysis based on CharIN (2018) and SEDC (2017).

Government revenue from taxation

Challenges

Governments typically collect tax revenues from three tax bases: road use (most frequently through highway tolls, congestion charges53 and cordon prices54), vehicle (most often through the registration and/or annual circulation taxes55) and energy use (typically through fuel taxes) Box 5.5).

Box 5.5. Fuel taxes in road transport

Fuel taxes are raised in most countries (approximately three-out-of-four) through the application of taxes added to the gasoline or diesel price. Other countries (around one-out-of-four) subsidise oil-based fuels (IEA, 2018d).56 In 2017, the prices of gasoline and diesel ranged from less than USD 0.1/L of fuel in countries with high subsidies to almost USD 2/L in the countries that apply the highest tax rates. In 2017, oil products represented more than 90% of global transport energy consumption (IEA, 2019b). Gasoline and diesel accounted for roughly 80% of the total of all fossil fuels used in transport and nearly all of the transport tax revenue (IEA, 2019b).

Governments also tax electricity. In terms of global coverage, the share of countries that tax electricity (about 85% of all countries) exceeds those that subsidise it (IEA, 2018d). As a percentage

53Congestion charges are road use charges that vary across different geographical areas and times of the day.

54One example of cordon pricing is the application of fees to regulate access to urban centres.

55Registration taxes often include a component (typically the value-added tax) that depends on the vehicle price and another component (often coupled with the vehicle environmental performance) that does not depend on it.

56The highest taxes per litre of fuel can generally be found in Europe, Japan and several small countries in Asia and Africa. In Europe, approximately 60% of the fuel price consists of taxes. Global regions hosting countries that subsidise transport fuels include Middle East, Africa, Latin America, Central Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (IEA, 2018d).

PAGE | 189

IEA. All rights reserved.

Global EV Outlook 2019

5. Challenges and solutions for EV deployment

 

 

 

 

of the total fuel price, electricity is taxed to an extent that is relatively similar to the one observed for gasoline and diesel (5% to 63% per unit of energy, depending on the country) (IEA, 2018e).57 Including taxes, electricity prices range between less than USD 0.5 per kWh in Saudi Arabia up to USD 0.33 per kWh in Denmark (IEA, 2018e).

Gasoline, diesel and electricity fuel prices and taxes in selected countries, 2017

 

0.25

 

 

 

 

Gasoline

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diesel

 

 

 

 

 

 

Electricity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(USD/kWh)

0.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Price

0.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

before tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes:

France,

 

to 2015.

Electricity

India

 

2018). India’s

gasoline

 

 

based on

OECD

 

 

.

Sources:

 

IEA

IEA (2018f),

EIA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transport taxes often differ across vehicle types (e.g. buses, passenger cars, trucks or motorcycles), whether the vehicle is used for a commercial or personal nature, or according to parameters that correlate with the energy efficiency and/or the environmental performance of the vehicle class. Overall, they constitute a significant part of national, state and local government revenue. The combination of taxes on transport vehicle and fuel use, for example, was recently estimated to be as high as 3.5% of GDP (OECD, 2014).

Given that electric vehicles are two-to-five-times more efficient than a comparable ICE vehicle and lead to zero tailpipe emissions of local pollutants in high-exposure areas such as urban roads, EVs have benefited from subsidies and rebates, to varying degrees in many car markets (Figure 5.4) (IEA, 2019a). Depending on the specific case considered, the system of vehicle taxation (either at the registration phase or in the form of recurring annual fees) can be designed in a way that leads to net generation of revenue or be revenue neutral (cases of systems leading to net subsidies are uncommon).58 With a significant transition towards zeroemissions vehicles (including EVs), the volume of vehicles offering good environmental performance will weigh progressively more in the total of all vehicles. All else being equal, this results in a net decline of taxes that are collected through these schemes.

57The highest electricity taxes are in the European Union and Brazil, whereas low electricity taxes are found in the United States, India and ASEAN (IEA, 2018e).

58The combined use of a differentiated set of taxes, excluding subsidies, is by definition a revenue-generating approach. It has characterised jurisdictions that tend to apply high vehicle taxation rates overall, as in the case of the vehicle registration taxes in Denmark (IEA, 2018g). The use of differentiated vehicle taxes enable the models with poor environmental performances to subsidise the incentives for models with better environmental performances and is often referred to as a fee bate or bonus/malus scheme. An iconic example of this approach is the case of France (Government of France, 2018).

PAGE | 190

IEA. All rights reserved.

Global EV Outlook 2019

5. Challenges and solutions for EV deployment

Figure 5.4. Passenger car taxation based on tailpipe CO2 emissions in selected countries, 2018

Bonus-Malus (EUR)

30 000

25 000

France

 

20 000

Sweden

 

15 000

Norway

 

10 000

Netherlands

 

5 000

 

0

 

0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200

-5 000

CO2 emissions (g/km)

-10 000

 

Notes: g/km = grammes per kilometre. Sweden applies its malus (tax) for a three-year period of ownership. The figure shows the total malus the owner of a new gasoline vehicle would have to pay over the first three-years of ownership; owners of diesel vehicles would pay an extra fee. For the Netherlands, taxation rates for vehicles with emissions above 61 grammes of carbon dioxide per kilometre (g CO2/km) are based on gasoline vehicles. An extra fee per g CO2 (not shown in the figure) applies to diesel vehicles with emissions above 61 g CO2/km.

Sources: IEA elaboration based on ACEA (2018).

A number of countries apply vehicle purchase taxes that differentiate on the basis of tailpipe GHG emissions and offer incentives for vehicles with the best performance supported by taxes on vehicles with poor performance.

The efficiency advantage of EVs, combined with the change in energy carrier that they enable (from oil products to electricity) means that, even at similar levels of taxation per unit of energy, BEVs and PHEVs are subject to lower charges per km in comparison with ICE vehicles (Figure 5.5). The effect is stronger if the level of fuel taxation per unit energy is not the same for oil products and electricity, a development that could become more common if fuels are taxed based on their carbon content and if power generation accelerates to low-carbon sources than the pool of liquid fuels used by transport vehicles.

The examples provided in Figure 5.4 show that, without any adjustment to the current taxation schemes, an expanding uptake of electric vehicles and other zero-emission technologies has the potential to lead to changes in tax revenue derived from vehicle and fuel taxes. Figure 5.4 illustrates effects coupled with taxes applied to vehicle and fuels, but additional impacts can also be associated with road use taxes, including countries that already have started to apply differentiated charges for EVs and other vehicles using zero-emissions technologies.59

59 In Norway, for example, zero-emissions vehicles have been exempted from parking fees, road tolls and they have been granted free access on ferries. Since 2018, local authorities are authorized to apply fees that are up to 50% of those imposed on ICE cars. The national taxation has not changed and EVs remain exempt from purchase tax, value-added tax, annual tax and road user tax (personal communication with Asbjørn Johnsen, Norwegian Public Roads Administration).

PAGE | 191

IEA. All rights reserved.

Соседние файлы в папке книги