- •Abstract
- •Acknowledgements
- •Highlights
- •Executive summary
- •Findings and recommendations
- •Electric mobility is developing at a rapid pace
- •Policies have major influences on the development of electric mobility
- •Technology advances are delivering substantial cost reductions for batteries
- •Strategic importance of the battery technology value chain is increasingly recognised
- •Other technology developments are contributing to cost cuts
- •Private sector response confirms escalating momentum for electric mobility
- •Outlooks indicate a rising tide of electric vehicles
- •Electric cars save more energy than they use
- •Electric mobility increases demand for raw materials
- •Managing change in the material supply chain
- •Safeguarding government revenue from transport taxation
- •New mobility modes have challenges and offer opportunities
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Electric Vehicles Initiative
- •EV 30@30 Campaign
- •Global EV Pilot City Programme
- •Scope, content and structure of the report
- •1. Status of electric mobility
- •Vehicle and charger deployment
- •Light-duty vehicles
- •Stock
- •Cars
- •Light-commercial vehicles
- •Sales and market share
- •Cars
- •Light-commercial vehicles
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Private chargers
- •Publicly accessible chargers
- •Small electric vehicles for urban transport
- •Stock and sales
- •Two/three-wheelers
- •Low-speed electric vehicles
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Buses
- •Stock and sales
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Trucks
- •Stock and sales
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Other modes
- •Shipping
- •Aviation
- •Energy use and well-to-wheel GHG emissions
- •Electricity demand and oil displacement
- •Well-to-wheel GHG emissions
- •References
- •2. Prospects for electric mobility development
- •Electric mobility targets: Recent developments
- •Country-level targets
- •City-level targets
- •Policy updates: Vehicles and charging infrastructure
- •Charging standards
- •Hardware
- •Communication protocols
- •Supporting policies
- •Canada
- •China
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure policies
- •Industrial policies
- •European Union
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure policies
- •Industrial policy
- •India
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure policies
- •Japan
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure policies
- •Industrial policy
- •Korea
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Industrial policy
- •United States
- •Vehicle policies
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Industrial policy
- •Other countries
- •The emergence of a Global Electric Mobility Programme
- •Industry roll-out plans
- •Vehicles
- •Light-duty vehicles
- •Two/three-wheelers
- •Buses
- •Trucks
- •Automotive batteries
- •Charging infrastructure
- •References
- •3. Outlook
- •Scenario definitions
- •Electric vehicle projections
- •Policy context for the New Policies Scenario
- •Global results
- •Two/three-wheelers
- •Light-duty vehicles
- •Buses
- •Trucks
- •Regional insights
- •China
- •Europe
- •India
- •Japan
- •United States and Canada
- •Other countries
- •Implications for automotive batteries
- •Capacity of automotive batteries
- •Material demand for automotive batteries
- •Charging infrastructure
- •Private chargers
- •Light-duty vehicles
- •Buses
- •Private charging infrastructure for LDVs and buses
- •Publicly accessible chargers for LDVs
- •Impacts of electric mobility on energy demand
- •Electricity demand from EVs
- •Structure of electricity demand for EVs in the New Policies Scenario
- •Structure of electricity demand for EVs in the EV30@30 Scenario
- •Implications of electric mobility for GHG emissions
- •References
- •4. Electric vehicle life-cycle GHG emissions
- •Context
- •Methodology
- •Key insights
- •Detailed assessment
- •Life-cycle GHG emissions: drivers and potential for emissions reduction
- •Effect of mileage on EV life-cycle GHG emissions
- •Effect of vehicle size and power on EV life-cycle emissions
- •Effect of power system and battery manufacturing emissions on EV life-cycle emissions
- •References
- •5. Challenges and solutions for EV deployment
- •Vehicle and battery costs
- •Challenge
- •EV purchase prices are not yet competitive with ICE vehicles
- •Indications from the total cost of ownership analysis
- •Effect of recent battery cost reductions on the cost gap
- •Impacts of developments in 2018 on the total cost of ownership
- •Solutions
- •Battery cost reductions
- •Reducing EV costs with simpler and innovative design architectures
- •Adapting battery sizes to travel needs
- •Supply and value chain sustainability of battery materials
- •Challenges
- •Solutions
- •Towards sustainable minerals sourcing via due diligence principles
- •Initiatives for better battery supply chain transparency and sustainable extractive activities
- •Bridging the gap between due diligence principles and on-the-ground actions
- •Battery end-of-life management
- •Implications of electric mobility for power systems
- •Challenges
- •Solutions
- •Potential for controlled EV charging to deliver grid services and participate in electricity markets
- •Enabling flexibility from EVs
- •Importance of policy actions to enable EV participation in markets
- •Government revenue from taxation
- •Challenges
- •Solutions
- •Near-term options
- •Long-term solutions
- •Shared and automated mobility
- •Challenges
- •Solutions
- •References
- •Statistical annex
- •Electric car stock
- •New electric car sales
- •Market share of electric cars
- •Electric light commercial vehicles (LCV)
- •Electric vehicle supply equipment stock
- •References
- •Acronyms, abbreviations and units of measure
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Units of measure
- •Table of contents
- •List of Figures
- •List of Boxes
- •List of Tables
Global EV Outlook 2019 |
2. Prospects for electric mobility development |
Korea
The key policy updates that are expected to drive the transition to electric mobility in Korea are summarised in Table 2.9.
Table 2.9. Overview of EV and EVSE policies in Korea, 2018/19
|
Country |
|
Policy type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulations |
|
|
|
(vehicles) |
|
|
|
Incentives |
|
Korea |
|
(vehicles) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Targets (vehicles) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial policy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentives |
|
|
|
(chargers) |
|
|
|
Targets |
|
|
|
(chargers) |
|
|
|
|
Description
Fuel economy standards for LDVs in 2020.
Subsidies and rebates on purchase taxes, reduced highway toll fees and public parking fees.
Stock of 430 000 BEVs by 2022.
Target to increase electric car production ten-fold by 2022, industries benefit of liquidity and loan support.
Available for both public and private chargers.
10 000 fast EV chargers by 2022.
Vehicle policies
Korea aims to have 430 000 BEVs and 67 000 FCEVs on the road by 2022 (Government of Korea, 2019a; Manthey, 2018). In 2019, the objective is to register 46 000 passenger cars and more than 1 300 heavy-duty BEVs, and initiate hydrogen-fuelled public buses in seven major cities, including Seoul and Busan (Government of Korea, 2019b).
Korea supports the increased uptake of EVs with a number of measures, including subsides and rebates on national and local vehicle purchase taxes, reduced highway toll fees and public parking fees.23 It also gives priority to low-emissions vehicles in public procurement programmes.
Tax rebates per EV (including BEVs and FCEVs) are capped at a maximum of KRW 5.3 million (Korean won, USD 4 500) (Korea Environment Corporation, 2019). The number of low-carbon vehicle that can benefit from from national subsidies (available on the top of the tax rebates) increased from 32 000 vehicles in 2018 to 57 000 in 2019 (Government of Korea, 2019a). BEV subsidies per vehicle are capped at a maximum of KRW 19 million (USD 16 400, up from KRW 14 million [USD 12 000] in 2018) and PHEVs at KRW 5 million (USD 4 300) (Government of Korea, 2019a).24
23In Seoul, EVs are exempt from parking fees for the first hour used for charging and can benefit from 50% discount for additional hours (Korean Environment Corporation, 2016).
24By comparison, the FCEV subsidy cap is KRW 36 million (USD 31 000). Despite the increased cap, the amount of EV subsidy from the government (per vehicle) has declined from KRW 12 million (USD 10 million) to KRW 9 million (USD 7.7 million) (Government of Korea, 2019a). Subsidies for an additional purchase of a vehicle within two years of the first purchase are not allowed. Institutions buying a large number of vehicles for research purposes will also not be eligible for subsidies (Government of Korea, 2019a).
PAGE | 78
IEA. All rights reserved.