- •Scientific Journal “Modern Linguistic and Methodical-and-Didactic Researches” Issue 4 (31), 2020 issn 2587-8093
- •Contents
- •Linguistics
- •Methods and didactics
- •Linguistics
- •Evolution of political correctness phenomenon in the english language (on material of paralympic vocabulary) t.A. Martseva, Yu.V. Kobenko, o.V. Solodovnikova, e.S. Riabova
- •Introduction.
- •References
- •Analyzed sources
- •Dictionaries
- •Linguo-pragmatic analysis of colloquial expressions in english professional discourse in the context of digital civilization development e.N. Malyuga, V.E. Ermishina
- •Introduction.
- •Verbs making up the lexical-semantic field “to spend money”
- •References
- •Analyzed sources
- •Dictionaries Used
- •Evaluative characteristics in research advisors’ reviews in the framework of academic discourse a.A. Vodyanitskaya
- •Introduction.
- •References
- •Introduction.
- •References
- •Criteria instrumentation for assessment the foreign language speech competence of future economists g.V. Sorokovykh, a.O. Andrukh
- •Introduction.
- •References
- •Analyzed sources
- •Dictionaries used
- •Blended foreign language learning with increased online component: hybridization strategies and educational technologies e.A. Alexeeva, s.Yu. Buryakova
- •Introduction.
- •References
- •Intercultural communication
- •Introduction.
- •References
- •Dictionaries used
- •Linking markemes in british prose of the first half of the twentieth century. Part 2 o.G. Artemova
- •Introduction.
- •References
- •Introduction.
- •References
- •Dictionaries used
- •Paroemias’ renomination in the literary texts translated into french e.Y. Lapaeva
- •Introduction.
- •References
- •Analyzed sources
- •Dictionaries used
- •Punctuation interference during translation (on the example of the french language of moroccan bilinguals) e.V. Kashkina, t.V. Gilyarovskaya
- •Introduction.
- •References
- •Analyzed sources
- •Dictionaries used
- •Scientific overview
- •About the all-russian educational online-conference 2020 "learning german-opening up the world"
- •Information about authors
- •Requirements for formatting articles for the Scientific Journal “Modern linguistic and methodical-and-didactic researches”
- •The information about the scientific papers published in russian
Dictionaries Used
[1**] Norman B.Ju. Lingvisticheskaja pragmatika, ili lingvopragmatika, pragmalingvistika. jeffektivnoe rechevoe obshhenie (bazovye kompetencii). Slovar'-spravochnik. Jelektronnoe izdanie. Sibirskij federal'nyj universitet ; Pod redakciej A.P. Skovorodnikova. Krasnojarsk, 2014 Izdatel'stvo: Sibirskij federal'nyj universitet (Krasnojarsk).
[2**] Jazykoznanie : bol'shoj jenciklopedicheskij slovar' / gl. red. V.N. Jarceva. Moskva: Bol'shaja rossijskaja jenciklopedija, 1998. 688 s.
[3**] The new Partridge dictionary of slang and unconventional English / Edited by Tom Dalzell and Terry Victor. Second edition. Routledge, 2013. 2506 p.
[4**] Zherebilo T.V. Slovar' lingvisticheskih terminov: Izd. 5-e, ispr-e i dopoln. Nazran': Izd-vo "Piligrim", 2010. 486 s.
[5**] Oxford phrasal verbs dictionary for learners of English. Oxford Univesity Press, second impression, 2002. 378 p.
[6**] Collins dictionary. URL: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/splurge (vremja obrashhenija 17.08.20).
[7**] The Oxford dictionary of slang / John Ayto. Oxford University Press, 1998. 474 p.
[8**] Shitova L.F., Bruskina T.L. English Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. Anglo-russkij slovar' idiom i frazovyh glagolov. 3-e izdanie. SPb. : Antologija, 2005. 256 s.
[9**] Oxford Russian minidictionary / Edited by Della Thompson. Oxford University Press, second edition, 2006. 741 p.
DOI 10.36622/MLMDR.2020.31.4.003
UDC 81-119
Evaluative characteristics in research advisors’ reviews in the framework of academic discourse a.A. Vodyanitskaya
Moscow City University Institute of Foreign Languages Associate professor of the Department of Linguistics and Translation Studies Albina Aleksandrovna Vodyanitskaya e-mail: avodyanickaya@yandex.ru |
Problem Statement. The paper focuses on evaluative characteristics of research advisors’ reviews functioning in the framework of academic discourse. Evaluative strategies and tactics have been revealed for the first time as a part of a research advisor’s review.
Results. The research has shown that research advisors characterize positively various aspects of graduate students’ research papers and the way they organized their research work. Negative evaluations are not verbalized, but teachers implicitly mention that their students should organize their work more thoroughly in the future. The fact that academic discourse has been acquired by the student to the full extent serves as a positive characteristic of their work, and, therefore, includes all the evaluations relevant for doing a research and for research results. In all the structural elements of the reviews research advisors use a variety of evaluative means. The latter are represented to a lesser extent in the structural element concerning the Ability of a student to retrieve information and to use a variety of information resources.
Conclusion. Research advisor’s review as a genre of academic discourse is an amalgam of evaluative means which enable the research advisor to explicitly verbalize his attitude towards a student research work. Evaluative means characterize those aspects of research work which are specified in the body of the review as structural elements. Moreover, teachers specifies work ethic, ethical behavior, personal characteristics that are crucial for the research work. The research has revealed evaluative strategies of intensification, recommendation, stating and implication.
Key words: academic discourse, evaluative means, research advisors’ reviews, theses, specific evaluative means, common evaluative means, evaluative strategies and tactics.
For citation: Vodyanitskaya A.A. Evaluative characteristics in research advisors’ reviews in the framework of academic discourse / A.A. Vodyanitskaya // Scientific Journal “Modern Linguistic and Methodical-and-didactic Researches”. – 2020. - № 4 (31). – P. 28-36.