References

[1] Sulejmanova O.A. Akademicheskij diskurs kak nepreryvnyj dialog s Drugim / O.A. Sulejmanova // Diskurs kak universal'naya matrica verbal'nogo vzaimodejstviya. – M.: LENAND, 2018. – S. 180-198.

[2] Fomina M.A. Sub"ekt akademicheskogo diskursa / M.A. Fomina // Diskurs kak universal'naya matrica verbal'nogo vzaimodejstviya. M.: LENAND, 2018. S. 199-210.

[3] Vodyanickaya A.A. Kognitivnye osnovaniya ocenki v akademicheskom diskurse / A.A. Vodyanickaya // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. – Vyp. XXXIII: Kognitivnye issledovaniya v gumanitarnyh naukah: materialy Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. 17-18 maya 2018. – Tambov: Print-Servis, 2018. – S. 181-185.

[4] McFadden A. Teachers as evaluators: Results from a systematic literature review / A. McFadden, K.E. William // Studies in Educational Evaluation. – Volume 64, March 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100830 (vremya obrashcheniya: 15.02.2020).

[5] Vodyanickaya A.A. Nauchnyj rukovoditel' kak sub"ekt akademicheskogo diskursa: cherez ocenochnye znacheniya k osmysleniyu ego roli / A.A. Vodyanickaya // Diskurs kak universal'naya matrica verbal'nogo vzaimodejstviya. – M.: LENAND, 2018. – S. 211-238.

[6] Schwandt T.A. Evaluation Foundations Revisited: Cultivating a Life of the Mind for Practice / T.A. Schwandt. – Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2015. – 216 p.

[7] Stufflebeam D.L. Evaluation Theory, Models, and Application / D.L. Stufflebeam, C.L.S. Coryn. – 2nd ed. – John Hoboken, NJ: Wiley&Sons, 2014. – 800 p.

[8] Vol'f E.M. Funkcional'naya semantika ocenki / E.M. Vol'f. – Izd. stereotip. – M.: URSS, 2019. – 278 s.

[9] Hutyz I.P. Akademicheskij diskurs. kul'turno-specificheskaya sistema konstruirovaniya i translyacii znanij / I.P. Hutyz. – M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2015. – 176 s.

[10] Teliya V.N. Konnotativnyj aspekt semantiki nominativnyh edinic / V.N. Teliya. – M.: Nauka, 1986. – 141 s.

[11] Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Hunston S., Thompson G. (eds.) – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. – 225 p.

[12] Vodyanitskaya A. Embedding Academic Values in Students in the Process of Developing their Writing Skills / A. Vodyanitskaya // INTED2020 Proceedings. – Valencia: IATED Academy, 2020. – P. 3559-3563.

[13] Arutyunova N.D. Tipy yazykovyh znachenij. Ocenka. Sobytie. Fakt / N.D. Arutyunova – M.: Nauka, 1988. – 338 s.

[14] Krathwohl D.L. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview / D.L. Kratwohl // Theory into Practice. Vol 41. – №4. Ohio: The Ohio State University, 2002. – P. 212-218.

[15] Sel'e G. Ot mechty k otkrytiyu: kak stat' uchyonym / G. Sel'e. – Per. s angl. – M.: Progress, 1987. – 368 s.

[16] Belonozhko N.D. Allyuziya kak ocenochnoe sredstvo yazyka: na materiale anglijskogo yazyka / N.D. Belonozhko. – Dis. … kand. filol. nauk. – M., 2013. – 150 s.

[17] SHmelev D.N. Sovremennyj russkij yazyk. Leksika / D.N. SHmelev. – M.: «Prosveshchenie», 1977. – 335 s.

[18] Lavrinenko I.YU. Emocional'nye koncepty v filosofskoj kartine mira F. Bekona (na materiale povesti F. Bekona "Novaya Atlantida") / I.YU. Lavrinenko // Nauchnyj Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo arhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. Seriya «Sovremennye lingvisticheskie i metodiko-didakticheskie issledovaniya». – Vypusk № 2 (14). – 2010. – S. 92-101.

[19] Suleimanova O.A. Linguistic Meta-Language as a Basis for Communication / Understanding: Abstract and Control / O.A. Suleimanova // Understanding by Communication. – Newcastle: Peter Lang, 2013. – S. 70-78.

Dictionaries used

[1*] Kul'tura russkoj rechi: Enciklopedicheskij slovar'-spravochnik. – M.: «Flinta», «Nauka», 2003. – 840 s.

METHODS AND DIDACTICS

DOI 10.36622/MLMDR.2020.31.4.004

UDC 37 013

INNOVATION IN THE GLOBAL PEDAGOGY: LEARNING THROUGH THE METHODOLOGY OF "SHENBANG»

Deng Jie

____________________________________________________________________________

Sun Yat-sen University of Guangzhou, China

PhD in Philology, lecturer

Deng Jie

e-mail: catcatvasily@hotmail.com

____________________________________________________________________________

Problem statement. The article discusses the problem of creating an innovative system of teaching schoolchildren, taking into account the requirements for the modernization of the educational system in China. The problem can be solved by developing the student's autonomy. The purpose of the research is to conduct a comparative analysis of methodological and theoretical methods for developing the autonomy of subjects of the educational process based on the material of the Shenben training system and the traditional training system. Subject of research – national-pedagogical system of training of pupils Shenben.

Results. The humanistic paradigm of education today is focused on individual and personal characteristics with different abilities and cognitive needs of schoolchildren. In China's school system, a large percentage of students have high scores on their final exams. However, in everyday life, they rarely use their knowledge, do not show initiative, and children lack creative potential. In the traditional Shiben system, the main role in the educational process belongs to the teacher. The result of the research is the theoretical and methodological development of the "Shenben" method, which involves constant development and improvement depending on the current context.

Conclusion. The developed author's method "Shenben" rebuilds the educational process, orients it to the child, who acts as an important resource against the background of Confucian culture and taking into account all the advantages of traditional education.

Key words: comparative analysis, subject-subject relations, quality of education, independent learning, self-organization, "Shenben" method, resource potential, nonlinear thinking, Confucian tradition, pedagogical cooperation.

For citation: Deng Jie. Innovation in the global pedagogy: learning through the methodology of "SHENBANG» / Deng Jie // Scientific Journal “Modern Linguistic and Methodical-and-didactic Researches”. – 2020. - № 4 (31). – P. 37-45.