Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ryder N., Griffiths M., Singh L. Commercial law - principles and policy 2012.pdf
Скачиваний:
17
Добавлен:
19.12.2022
Размер:
3.27 Mб
Скачать

228

Payment in international sales

 

 

 

provides a consultancy function to assess the financial stability of the parties

 

and to give advice on conducting the transaction.

 

Q5 Discuss the nature and purpose of factoring as a means of financing inter-

 

national trade. What types of transactions is this method of payment most

 

suited to?

 

(c)â Laws governing factoring

 

The UNIDROIT Convention on International Factoring was drafted by the

 

International Institute for the Unification of Private Law in May 1988 in Ottawa,

 

Canada. The purpose of the Convention was to harmonise international factor-

 

ing transactions, reduce uncertainties and to promote international trade. The

 

Convention has been ratified, most noticeably by France, Germany and Italy.47

 

 

Article 2 states that the Convention will apply when parties have their places of

 

business in different states. Article 3 states that the parties may exclude the appli-

 

cation of the Convention. Article 8 sets out the duty of the debtor to pay the factor

 

for the receivables once they have been assigned to him. Article 6 (which was the

 

result of much compromise at the drafting of the Convention) provides that:

 

 

the assignment of a receivable by the supplier to the factor shall be effective not-

 

 

withstanding any agreement between the supplier and the debtor prohibiting

 

 

such assignment.48

 

 

However, Article 6(2) allows states which make a declaration under

 

Article 1849 to circumvent this provision. This is further qualified by Article

 

6(3), which stipulates:

 

 

Nothing in paragraph 1 shall affect any obligation of good faith owed by the sup-

 

 

plier to the debtor or any liability of the supplier to the debtor in respect of an

 

 

assignment made in breach of the terms of the contract of sale of goods.

 

 

This presents a concern over the certainty of the factoring transaction for

 

the parties involved. The Convention also presents limitations in its scope, as it

 

does not address issues such as insolvency of the parties or conflict of laws.

 

7â Forfaiting

 

The term ‘forfait’ derives from the French ‘a forfait’ which means to surren-

 

der one’s rights. Forfaiting is another mechanism used to finance international

 

trade and is most commonly seen in Europe. The forfaitor will purchase the

 

47

See www.unidroit.org/english/implement/i-88-f.pdf.

 

48

UNIDROIT Convention, Art. 6(1).

 

49

A Contracting State may at any time make a declaration in accordance with Art. 6(2) that an

 

 

assignment under Art. 6(1) shall not be effective against the debtor if, at the time of conclusion of

 

 

the contract of sale of goods, it has its place of business in that state.

229

9â Recommended reading

 

 

 

receivable from the exporter at a discount. This will be evidenced by a prom-

 

issory note, a bill of exchange, a deferred payment letter of credit or a letter

 

of guarantee. The transaction will be without recourse to the exporter, which

 

means that the forfaitor will assume the risks inherent in the transaction.

 

Forfaiting differs from factoring in that forfait can be used for the entire con-

 

tract value and is usually used for longer maturity dates of one to five years.

 

The process of forfaiting works in the following way. The exporter and

 

importer negotiate the terms of the commercial contract, the exporter sends

 

the details to the forfaitor, and the forfaitor then agrees a discounted rate for the

 

receivable. The exporter and importer enter into the commercial contract. The

 

exporter ships the goods to the importer, and the promissory note or bill of

 

exchange is sent to the forfaitor and endorsed without recourse. Once this is

 

verified payment is made to the exporter. The forfaitor will present the bill or

 

promissory note to the importer on the date of maturity and payment of the

 

debt will be made to the forfaitor.

 

Forfaiting offers several benefits in that it creates liquidity and reduces risks

 

to the exporter. It also benefits the importer by giving him a longer period to

 

repay the debt at a fixed rate. However, forfaiting is not suitable for transactions

 

involving small sums or short periods of time. It is also unsuitable in countries

 

that are financially weak.

 

Q6 Identify the main differences between factoring and forfaiting. In what cir-

 

cumstances will the parties choose the latter option?

8â Conclusion

The smooth running of international trade transactions depends on the ability of the parties to make timely payments for goods. We have examined the benefits and drawbacks of various methods of international financing, including factoring and forfaiting. As seen above, letters of credit continue to serve as an important tool in international trade. They can provide efficiency as well as security to buyers and sellers located in different countries. However, the rigorous procedures and strict compliance guidelines often result in the letter of credit being rejected by the banks. The UCP 600 rules have alleviated some of these problems, however it is only applicable through incorporation by the parties. In addition to this, the UCP 600 does not address issues such as insolvency or fraud and the parties can often find themselves at risk in the transaction. Until there is a harmonised international measure to govern letter of credit transactions, parties are advised to exercise care in drafting their contracts.

9â Recommended reading

Arora, A. ‘The dilemma of an issuing bank: to accept or reject documents under a letter of credit’ (1984) LMCLQ 81

230 Payment in international sales

Buckley, R.P. ‘Potential pitfalls with letters of credit’ (1996) 70 ALJ 217 Creed, N. ‘The governing law of letter of credit transactions’ (2001) 16 JIBL 41

Dolan, J. ‘Strict compliance with letters of credit: striking a fair balance’ (1985) BLJ 18 Ellinger, E.P. ‘The uniform customs and practice for documentary credits (UCP): their

development and the current revisions’ (2007) LMCLQ 152

Enonchong, N. ‘The autonomy principle of letters of credit: an illegality exception?’ (2006) LMCLQ 404

Kozolchyk, B. ‘Strict compliance and the reasonable document checker’ (1990) 56

BLR 48

Ortego, J. and Krinick, E. ‘Letters of credit: benefits and drawback of the independence principle’ (1998) 115 BLJ 487

Salinger, F. ‘International factoring and conflicts of law’ (2007) 1(1) LFMR 7 Ward, G. ‘The legal context of forfaiting trade finance’ (1991) 12(2) BLR 47