- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index
192 |
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
Let us now evaluate the effective η-dependent mass term
2 |
(η) = |
θ |
(5.9.35) |
meff |
θ (η) |
in the slow roll approximation.
Starting from its definition in (5.9.27), the function θ (η) can be rewritten as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
dt |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
θ = |
|
= |
a˙ da a |
= |
H |
(5.9.36) |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
aϕ |
|
|
dt |
ϕ˙ |
aϕ |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a da |
|
|
˙ |
|
|
|||
Calculating the first derivative of θ we obtain: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
θ = a dt |
aϕ |
= a aϕ − a2ϕ2 a˙ ϕ˙ − a2ϕ2 ϕ¨ |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
d |
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
|
H |
|
|
H |
|
H a |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
|
˙ |
|
˙ |
|||
|
|
|
H 2 |
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H 2 |
|
|
|||||||||
= ϕ˙ − |
|
|
|
− |
|
ϕ¨ ≈ ϕ˙ − |
|
|
|
|
(5.9.37) |
|||||||||||
|
ϕ |
|
ϕ2 |
|
|
ϕ |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
˙ |
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
|
where we used the exact result (5.8.23) and where the last approximate equality follows from the slow-rolling condition ϕ¨ ≈ 0. Using this approximate result in the calculation of the second derivative we obtain:
|
d |
|
H 2 |
|
|
d H 2 |
|
2H H |
|
H 2 |
|
||||
θ = a |
|
ϕ˙ − |
|
|
−a |
|
|
|
= −a |
ϕ |
˙ |
− |
|
ϕ¨ |
|
dt |
ϕ |
dt |
ϕ |
ϕ2 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
˙ |
|
|
|
|
˙ |
|
˙ |
|
|
˙ |
|
˙
≈ −2 H H ϕ˙
Consequently we obtain:
m2 |
(η) |
≡ |
θ |
(η) slow roll |
2a2H |
|
θ |
||||||
eff |
|
− |
˙ |
During an almost exponential expansion the scale factor behaves as:
a − 1 H η
Hence we conclude that in the slow roll approximation we have
mslow2 -roll |
≈ η2 × μ; |
μ ≡ |
− H˙2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
H |
|
(5.9.38)
(5.9.39)
(5.9.40)
(5.9.41)
In other words the effective scalar degree of freedom propagates as if it were in de Sitter space yet with an effective η-dependent mass term depressed by the almost
|
|
H |
' |
H 2 |
in the slow roll phase. Note |
constant factor μ which is very small since ˙ |
|
||||
also that μ is positive since |
˙ |
is negative. Indeed in the slow rolling phase the |
|||
|
H |
|
|
|
|
expansion is slowly decelerating.
5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton |
193 |
5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
Having discussed its meaning, let us derive the propagation equation (5.9.26) of the scalar perturbation.
Combining the result (5.9.18)–(5.9.20) for the Einstein tensor with the result (5.9.22)–(5.9.24) for the stress-energy tensor we obtain a set of equations which immediately yield the following constraints. Since the perturbation δTij of the stressenergy tensor is diagonal and proportional to the Kronecker δij , the same must be true of the corresponding Einstein tensor. This occurs if and only if:
Φ = Ψ |
(5.9.42) |
which therefore has to be imposed. Next let us consider the implication of the equation δG0i = 4π GδT 0i . This latter can be rewritten as follows:
1 |
Ψ |
+ H Φ − 2π Gϕ δϕ = 0 |
(5.9.43) |
a2 ∂i |
Using (5.9.42) and fixing the boundary condition at some reference time, (5.9.43) implies:
Ψ + H Ψ − 2π Gϕ δϕ = 0 |
(5.9.44) |
By means of identities following from the equations satisfied by the background fields, the constraint (5.9.44) can be rewritten in the following way:
d |
|
a2 |
Ψ |
|
aϕ |
2 |
|
δϕ |
|
|
||
|
|
|
= 2π G |
|
|
|
H |
|
|
+ Ψ |
(5.9.45) |
|
∂η |
H |
H |
|
ϕ |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To prove such a result we just compare the following elaborations of the l.h.s. and r.h.s. of (5.9.45).
|
|
d |
|
|
|
a2Ψ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
l.h.s. = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
∂η |
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
2aa |
|
|
|
a2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
= |
|
|
|
Ψ + |
|
|
|
|
Ψ |
− |
|
|
|
H Ψ |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
H |
H |
H |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
= 2a2Ψ + |
a2 |
|
|
|
− |
a2 |
H |
Ψ |
|
|
|
|
(5.9.46) |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Ψ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
H |
H |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
H ϕ |
|
|
+ Ψ |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
r.h.s. = 2π G aϕ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
δϕ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
= a2 |
|
|
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
H 2 |
) |
|
Ψ |
|||||||
2πH 2 ) |
2 |
|
H ϕ |
|
|
2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G(ϕ |
|
|
|
|
|
δϕ |
|
|
|
2π G(ϕ |
|
|||||||||||||
= |
a2 |
|
2π Gϕ δϕ |
+ |
−H + H |
2 |
Ψ |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Ψ |
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
= a2 |
|
|
− |
|
+ 2Ψ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.9.47) |
|||||||||||||||||||
H |
H 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
showing that they are indeed equal. In going from the second to the third line of (5.9.47) we used the background field equation (5.9.8), while in going from the third to the fourth we used the constraint equation (5.9.44).
Let us next consider the equation δG00 = 4π GδT 00. In view of (5.9.18) and (5.9.22) we can write:
2Ψ − 3H Ψ + H Φ = 2π G ϕ δϕ − ϕ 2Φ + a2 dϕ δϕ |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
dV |
|
= 2π G ϕ δϕ − ϕ 2Φ − ϕ + 2H ϕ δϕ |
|
||||
= 2π G ϕ 2 ϕ |
− 2H |
ϕ − Φ |
(5.9.48) |
||
|
δϕ |
|
δϕ |
|
where, in stepping from the first to the second line we have used the back-ground equation (5.9.6). Using the constraint equations (5.9.42) and (5.9.44) we can further rewrite (5.9.48) as follows:
2Ψ = 2π G ϕ 2 δϕ + H δϕ − Ψ
ϕϕ
|
2π G(ϕ |
2 |
|
d |
|
δϕ |
|
|
= |
|
) |
|
|
H |
|
+ Ψ |
(5.9.49) |
H |
|
|
dη |
ϕ |
In stepping from the first to the second line of the above equation one makes once again use of (5.9.8) and (5.9.44).
Consider now the following redefined fields:
u = |
|
a |
|
(5.9.50) |
||
|
|
Ψ |
|
|||
ϕ |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
ϕ |
|
|
v = |
2π Ga δϕ + |
|
Ψ |
(5.9.51) |
||
H |
in terms of them and of the function z(η) of the conformal time η defined in (5.9.27), (5.9.49) and (5.9.45) can be rewritten as:
2u = z |
|
d |
|
v |
|
(5.9.52) |
|||
|
|
|
|
||||||
dη |
z |
||||||||
v = |
1 d |
|
(zu) |
(5.9.53) |
|||||
|
|
|
|||||||
z |
dη |
By taking the Laplacian 2 of the latter equation and the derivative dηd of the former one obtains a system from which we can eliminate v obtaining the second order equation (5.9.26) satisfied by the field u(η, xi ). Alternatively we can eliminate u obtaining the following field equation for the v(η, xi ) field:
v − 2v − z v = 0 |
(5.9.54) |
z