- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index
174 5 Cosmology and General Relativity
so that:
hom(tPlanck) |
= 1028 |
(5.7.9) |
|
||
hor(tPlanck) |
|
This means that according to the Standard Cosmological Model our Universe has evolved from a completely homogeneous region that was 103×28 bigger than a causally connected region. How could it be homogeneous if there was no possibility of communication among the various causally disconnected cells and of establishing thermal equilibrium?
This paradox is named the horizon problem. Another conceptual problem is named the flatness problem. It appears from all our present cosmological data that our Universe is spatially flat, namely that the cosmological parameter Ω is nearly equal to 1. Why is that so? Who prepared once again the initial conditions in such a precise way as to make Ω exactly equal to one?
The answer to both problems can be provided by the scenario of a primeval cosmic inflation.
As we observed in Sect. 5.6.1, during a phase of exponential expansion of the scale factor the horizon scale remains constant so that, assuming the existence of such a phase in our remote past, explains how a single causally connected region could split into many apparently disconnected ones. Similarly as we will see in the sequel we can argue that the Universe always exits flat from an exponential expansion phase irrespectively of the spatial curvature it had when it entered such a phase.
Hence an exponential inflation provides a generic mechanism able to solve the conceptual problems of cosmology. The question is: which kind of matter can provide the means of realizing such an inflationary phase. The answer is simple enough. It suffices to have a microscopic dynamical theory that besides other fields includes also scalar ones, self-interacting through the presence of some potential. In the next section we will see that the requirements on the structure of the potential in order to realize a reasonable inflationary phase are rather mild and generic. This implies that the inflationary universe scenario is robust.
5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
The dynamical basis of inflation is fairly simple. The paradigm is provided by the simple model of a scalar field ϕ(x) interacting with gravity and with itself by means of some potential V (ϕ).
Let us write the following action:
A = |
|
d4x (Lgrav + Lscalar) |
|
|||
Lgrav = |
|
R[g] |
(5.8.1) |
|||
− Det g |
||||||
|
|
|
1 |
∂μϕ∂ν ϕgμν − V (ϕ) |
|
|
Lscalar = − Det g |
|
|
||||
2 |
|
5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation |
175 |
Varying it respectively in the metric g and in the scalar field ϕ we obtain the following coupled equations:
|
|
|
|
Gμν ≡ Rμν − |
1 |
gμν R[g] = 4π GTμν [ϕ] |
(5.8.2) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|||||||
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d |
|
|||
√ |
|
∂μ |
− Det ggμν ∂ν ϕ |
+ |
|
V (ϕ) = 0 |
(5.8.3) |
|||||
dϕ |
||||||||||||
− Det g |
where the stress energy tensor of the scalar field is given by:
Tμν [ϕ] = |
2 |
∂μϕ∂ν ϕ − |
2 gμν |
2 gρσ ∂ρ ϕ∂σ ϕ − V (ϕ) |
(5.8.4) |
||
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
If we introduce the homogeneous, isotropic ansatz (5.4.4) for the metric g and if we assume that the scalar field ϕ = ϕ(t) depends only on the cosmic time t , then the two equations (5.8.2) and (5.8.3) are easily worked out and reduce to a very simple form. It suffices to observe that, under the above conditions, the stress energy tensor of the scalar field has the canonical form (5.3.49) of a fluid, with the following identification of the energy density and of the pressure:
ρ = |
1 |
ϕ˙2 + |
1 |
V (ϕ) |
(5.8.5) |
4 |
2 |
||||
p = |
1 |
ϕ˙2 − |
1 |
V (ϕ) |
(5.8.6) |
|
|
||||
4 |
2 |
Inserting this result into the Friedman equations (5.4.12) and choosing a vanishing cosmological constant (Λ = 0)4 we obtain:
H |
2 + a2 |
= |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
ϕ˙ |
2 + |
2 V (ϕ) |
(5.8.7) |
||||||
|
|
κ |
|
8π G |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
a |
= − |
3 |
|
2 |
|
˙ |
− |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
a¨ |
|
|
8π G |
1 |
ϕ2 |
|
|
V (ϕ) |
|
(5.8.8) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where: |
|
|
|
|
H (t) |
|
a(t˙ ) |
(5.8.9) |
|
≡ a(t) |
||||
|
|
is the Hubble function. The differential system is completed by the explicit form of the propagation equation (5.8.3) of the scalar field which, in the chosen metric, is the following one:
ϕ |
3H ϕ |
|
V |
|
0 |
|
V |
|
dV |
(5.8.10) |
|
+ |
= |
; |
≡ dϕ |
||||||||
¨ + |
˙ |
|
|
|
|
4This choice has the following motivation. In presence of a generic potential for the scalar field, the cosmological constant is redundant. Indeed any constant contribution to V (ϕ) just plays the role of a cosmological constant.
176 |
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
Equations (5.8.7), (5.8.8), (5.8.10) encode the inflationary Universe paradigm. To explain this let us explore some possible solutions of this differential system.
5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
Consider a value ϕ0 of the scalar field corresponding to an extremum of the scalar potential where this latter attains a finite positive value:
V0 |
≡ |
dV (ϕ) |
8 |
|
|
= |
0 |
; |
V0 |
= |
V (φ0) > 0 |
dϕ |
|
ϕ0 |
|||||||||
|
8ϕ |
= |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this case we can solve (5.8.7), (5.8.8), (5.8.10) by setting:
|
|
|
ϕ(t) = ϕ0 |
|
||||||||
and |
a+(t) ≡ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for κ = 1 |
|||
|
|
|
H0 |
0 |
t |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
cosh H |
|
||||||
a(t) |
a |
|
(t) |
|
sinh H0t |
for κ 1 |
||||||
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
H0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
≡ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= − |
|
|
= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
a0(t) ≡ |
H0 |
0 |
|
|
|
for κ = 0 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
exp H t |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where in all cases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H0 |
= |
|
|
4π G |
V0 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(5.8.11)
(5.8.12)
(5.8.13)
(5.8.14)
Recalling the results of Sect. 5.5.3 it follows that, for a constant scalar field sitting at an extremal point of the potential, Einstein equations are solved by de Sitter space, which can be represented in the three versions of a closed, open or spatially flat Universe, in any case exponentially expanding. Indeed, differently from the case of all other fluids, characterized by a pressure p > − 13 ρ, the equation of state p = −ρ, satisfied when ϕ˙ = 0, implies, irrespectively of the sign κ of the spatial curvature, a constant positive acceleration of the Universe expansion, which proceeds indefinitely with an exponential asymptotic behavior. For large t the three scale factors a±(t) and a0(t) have the same form and tend to merge. This is quite clear from Friedman equations. The curvature term κ/a2(t) becomes negligible for large values of a(t), which are always attained in an expanding Universe.
Considering the three metrics dsdS2 + , dsdS2 − and dsdS2 0 , we see that, not only they describe the same intrinsic geometry, but they also approximately coincide in an open region Olate of de Sitter space, corresponding to late times and relatively small distances:
MdS Olate = {t & 1, r ' 1, θ, φ } |
(5.8.15) |
|
|
all range