- •1. TABLE OF CONTENTS
- •DI:2. BASIC DESIGN
- •DI:2.1 REFERENCES
- •DI:3. COMMERCIAL
- •3.1 REFERENCES
- •DI:4. PRODUCT DESIGN
- •DI:4.1 LEGAL DESIGN AXIOMS
- •4.2 REFERENCES
- •DI:5. SPECIFICATIONS
- •5.1 REFERENCES
- •DI:6. DESIGN METHODS
- •DI:6.1 BLACK BOX DESIGN
- •DI:6.2 REFERENCES
- •DI:7. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
- •DI:7.1 GENERATION OF CONCEPTS
- •DI:7.1.1 Brain Storming
- •DI:7.1.1.1 - Practice Problems
- •DI:7.1.2 Diagramming
- •DI:7.1.2.1 - Practice Problems
- •DI:7.1.3 Patents
- •DI:7.2 CONCEPT EVALUATION
- •DI:7.2.1 Decision Matrix
- •7.3 REFERENCES
- •DI:8. HUMAN FACTORS/ERGONOMICS
- •DI:8.1 ERGONOMICS
- •DI:8.2 SAFETY
- •DI:8.2.1 Environment
- •DI:8.2.2 MIL-STD 882B - System Safety Program Requirements
- •DI:8.3 HUMAN STRENGTH AND PROPORTIONS
- •DI:8.4 EQUIPMENT INTERFACES
- •8.5 REFERENCES
- •DI:9. MANAGEMENT
- •DI:9.1 PRACTICE PROBLEMS
- •9.2 REFERENCES
- •DI:10. DESIGN TEAMS
- •DI:10.1 TEAM PROFILES
- •DI:10.1.1 Personalities
- •DI:10.1.1.1 - Personality Traits
- •DI:10.1.1.2 - Personality Types
- •DI:10.1.2 Team Composition
- •DI:10.1.3 Team Success
- •10.2 REFERENCES
- •DI:11. ADMINISTRATION
- •11.1 REFERENCES
- •DI:12. CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
- •DI:12.1 OVERVIEW
- •DI:12.2 DOING CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
- •DI:12.3 FUTURE TOOLS FOR CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
- •DI:12.4 SOFTWARE CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
- •DI:12.5 METHODS
- •12.6 REFERENCES
- •DI:13. DESIGN FOR X (DFX)
- •DI:13.1 OVERVIEW
- •DI:13.2 DESIGN FOR ASSEMBLY (DFA)
- •DI:13.2.1 Design rule summary
- •DI:13.2.2 Rules for Manual/Automatic Assembly
- •DI:13.2.3 Reducing the Number of Parts
- •DI:13.2.4 Feeding and Orienting Parts
- •DI:13.2.4.1 - Part Tangling/Nesting
- •DI:13.2.4.2 - Handling Parts
- •DI:13.2.4.3 - Orienting Parts
- •DI:13.2.4.4 - Locating and Aligning Parts
- •DI:13.2.4.5 - Part Symmetry
- •DI:13.2.4.6 - Part Shape, Size and Thickness
- •DI:13.2.5 Mating Parts
- •DI:13.2.6 Adjustments
- •DI:13.2.7 Modular Assemblies
- •DI:13.2.8 Standard Parts
- •DI:13.2.9 Part Fixtures and Jigs
- •DI:13.2.10 Bottom Up Layered Assemblies
- •DI:13.2.11 Examples
- •DI:13.3 DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURING (DFM)
- •DI:13.4 DESIGN FOR RECYCLING (DFR)
- •DI:13.4.1 Reduce Materials and Energy
- •DI:13.4.2 Consolidated Parts
- •DI:13.4.3 Ease Of Disassembly
- •DI:13.4.4 Recycling Markings
- •DI:13.5 REFERENCES
- •DI:13.6 SAMPLE QUESTIONS
- •DI:13.7 AXIOMATIC DESIGN
- •DI:13.7.1 Suh’s Methodology
- •DI:13.7.1.1 - The Information Axiom
- •DI:14. DRAFTING
- •DI:14.1 CONVENTIONAL DRAFTING
- •DI:14.1.1 Manual Drafting
- •DI:14.1.2 Turning Three Dimensions Into Two (Multi View Drawings)
- •DI:14.1.2.1 - The Glass Box
- •DI:14.1.3 Lines
- •DI:14.1.4 Holes
- •DI:14.1.5 Special Cases
- •DI:14.1.5.1 - Aligned Features
- •DI:14.1.5.2 - Incomplete Views
- •DI:14.1.6 Section Views
- •DI:14.1.6.1 - Full Sections
- •DI:14.1.6.2 - Offset Section
- •DI:14.1.6.3 - Half Section
- •DI:14.1.6.4 - Cut Away Sections
- •DI:14.1.6.5 - Revolved Section
- •DI:14.1.6.6 - Removed Section
- •DI:14.1.6.7 - Auxiliary Section
- •DI:14.1.6.8 - Thin Wall Section
- •DI:14.1.6.9 - Assembly Section
- •DI:14.1.6.10 - Special Cases
- •DI:14.1.6.11 - Fill Patterns
- •DI:14.1.7 Auxiliary Views
- •DI:14.1.7.1 - Secondary Auxiliary Views
- •DI:14.1.7.2 - Partial Auxiliary Views
- •DI:14.1.8 Descriptive Geometry
- •DI:14.1.9 Isometric Views
- •DI:14.1.10 Special Techniques
- •DI:14.2 NOTATIONS
- •DI:14.2.1 Basic Dimensions and Tolerances
- •DI:14.2.2 Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD & T)
- •DI:14.2.2.1 - Feature Control Symbols
- •DI:14.2.2.2 - Symbols and Meaning
- •DI:14.2.2.3 - Datums
- •DI:14.2.2.4 - Modifiers
- •DI:14.3 WORKING DRAWINGS
- •DI:14.3.1 Drawing Elements
- •DI:14.3.1.1 - Title Blocks
- •DI:14.3.1.2 - Drawing Checking
- •DI:14.3.1.3 - Drawing Revisions
- •DI:14.3.1.4 - Bill of Materials (BOM)
- •DI:14.3.2 Drawing Types
- •DI:14.3.2.1 - Assembly Drawings
- •DI:14.3.2.2 - Subassembly Drawings
- •DI:14.3.2.3 - Exploded Assembly Drawings
- •DI:14.3.2.4 - Detailed Drawings
- •DI:14.4 PRACTICE PROBLEMS
- •14.5 REFERENCES
- •DI:15. COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN (CAD)
- •DI:15.1 DESIGN
- •DI:15.2 CAD HISTORY
- •DI:15.3 BASIC REQUIREMENTS OF CAD SYSTEMS
- •DI:15.4 EDITING AND CREATING
- •DI:15.4.1 2D Curves and Lines
- •DI:15.4.2 Surfaces
- •DI:15.5 USER INTERPRETATION OF THE GEOMETRIC MODEL
- •DI:15.6 USER DIRECTED CHANGES TO THE GEOMETRIC MODEL
- •DI:15.6.1 Modern Hardware for CAD Systems
- •DI:15.7 SELECTING A CAD SYSTEM
- •DI:15.7.1 An Example Plan for Selecting a CAD system
- •DI:15.7.2 A Checklist of CAD/CAM System Features
- •DI:15.8 DESIGN
- •DI:15.8.1 Graphical User Interfaces
- •DI:15.9 PRACTICE PROBLEMS
- •DQ:16. GEOMETRICAL MODELLING OF PARTS
- •DQ:16.1 OVERVIEW
- •DQ:16.2 GEOMETRIC MODELS
- •DQ:16.2.1 Elemental Depiction:
- •DQ:16.2.2 Surface Description
- •DQ:16.2.3 Solid - Swept
- •DQ:16.2.4 Solid - B-Rep (Boundary Representation)
- •DQ:16.2.5 Solid - CSG
- •DQ:16.2.6 Tessellated Models
- •DQ:16.2.7 Features
- •DQ:16.3 SOLID MODELERS
- •DO:16.4 MASS PROPERTIES
- •DO:16.5 NON-MANIFOLD PARTS
- •DO:16.6 NUMERICAL ACCURACY
- •DO:16.7 PRACTICE PROBLEMS
- •DM:17. GEOMETRICAL MODELLING FOR DESIGN
- •DG:18. CAD FILE FORMATS
- •DG:18.1 GRAPHICS FORMATS
- •DG:18.2 CAD FORMATS
- •DG:18.2.1 Proprietary “Standard” Formats
- •DG:18.2.2 Standard Formats
- •DG:18.2.2.1 - IGES
- •DG:18.2.2.1.1 - Flag section (optional)
- •DG:18.2.2.1.2 - Start section
- •DG:18.2.2.2 - Global section
- •DG:18.2.2.3 - Directory entry sections
- •DG:18.2.2.4 - Parameter entry section
- •DG:18.2.2.5 - Terminate section
- •DG:18.2.2.6 - A Sample IGES File
- •DG:18.2.3 A DXF File
- •DG:18.3 PDES/STEP
- •DG:18.4 PRACTICE PROBLEMS
- •DC:19. COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING (CAE)
- •DC:19.1 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS (FEA)
- •DC:19.2 ASSEMBLY AND KINEMATICS
- •DC:19.2.1 Tolerancing
- •DC:19.3 ASSEMBLIES
- •DC:19.4 OPTIMIZATION
page 30
DI:10. DESIGN TEAMS
• Selecting team membership appropriately increased the chance of success in the design.
DI:10.1 TEAM PROFILES
• To select members of teams we must consider psychological factors and the general objectives of a design.
DI:10.1.1 Personalities
• We can develop categories of people by using some indicators of personality (this is not to be taken too seriously).
DI:10.1.1.1 - Personality Traits
•In terms of organizational behavior there are some traits (note - not strengths) that may be identified. A personality can be made up of a combination of these traits.
a.detail oriented - pays a great amount of attention to information. Investigative in nature. This person does not like lingering questions, etc. A large amount of time will be spent trying to prove things completely
b.planning/organization - looks forward and lays out steps. Prefers a well ordered sequence and wants to know/decide what will happen next and on.
c.innovator - breaks traditional molds. This person does not mind changing direction and will invent unexpected solutions.
d.concrete/constructor - A ‘touchy-feely’ person that move easily into implementation. This person is skills oriented and will take pleasure in the practice/methods of developing a solution.
•A good team will overall have a combination of each of these traits.
•As an exercise,
1.pick a partner.
2.for your partner, write down a number from 1 to 4 for the points above. The total score cannot be above 10. Don’t let your partner see your numbers.
3.write down similar numbers for yourself.
4.talk to your partner about the numbers you got, compared to what they gave you.
page 31
DI:10.1.1.2 - Personality Types
•We can also classify individuals as,
-introverts/extroverts
-concept/detail oriented
-subjective/objective
-decisive/flexible
•When introverted individuals are encountered,
-encourage them to speak out
-make team members aware of the introverts message
-use introverts to “check” extroverts
•Extroverted individuals may require,
-slow them down and allow time for thought
-make extroverts listen to others and repeat
-ensure they don’t “dominate” the group
•Fact oriented people,
-need to be encouraged to think wildly
-need to plan/set goals before starting
•Concept oriented people,
-need to be grounded in detail and should be asked to explain in detail.
-keep these individuals on track
•As an exercise, consider what to do with the remaining two personality types to make a design team more effective.