Kanaeva_N_A_Zabolotnykh_E_L_-_Problema_vyvodnogo_znania_v_Indii_Logiko-epistemologicheskie_vozzrenia_Dignagi (1)
.pdf187.Goekoop C. The Logic of Invariable Concomitance in the Tattvacintamani: Gangesa's Anumitinirupana and Vyaptivada with introduction, transl. and comment. Dordrecht, 1967.
188.Goodman N. The Problem of Counterfactual Conditionals.—The Journal of Philosophy. 1947, vol. 44, № 5.
189.Grimm G. Die Wissenshaft des Buddhismus. Lpz., 1923.
190. Guha D.H. |
Navya-Nyaya System of Logic: Basic Theories and Techniques. |
2nd revised |
ed. Delhi, 1979. |
191.Haas W.S. The Destiny of the Mind: East and West. L., 1956.
192.Halbfass W. Indien und Europa: Perspektiven ihrer geistigen Begegnung. BaselStuttgart, 1981.
193.Hanson W.H. On Formalizing the Distinction between Logical and Factual Truth. — Journal of Symbolic Logic. 1966, vol. 31, № 3.
194.Hattori M. Prasastapada and Dignaga: A Note on the Development of the Vaisesika
Theory of Anumana. — Wiener Zeitschrift fur die Kunde Siidund Ostasiens. 1972, vol. 16.
195.Herzberger H.G. Double Negation in Buddhist Logic. — Journal of Indian Philosophy. 1975, vol. 3, № 1/2.
196. Hintikka K.J. |
Aristotle on Modality and Determinism. In collaboration with |
U. Rames and |
S. Knuuttila. — Acta Philosophica Fennica. Vol. 29. Amsterdam, |
1977. |
|
197.Hintikka K.J. Time and Necessity: Studies in Aristotle's Theory of Modality. Oxf., 1973.
198.Horn LR. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago-London, 1989.
199.Ingalls D.H.H. Materials for the Study of Navya-Nyaya Logic. Cambridge (Mass.) — London, 1951.
200.JkaR.C. The Vedantic and the Buddhist Concept of Reality as Interpreted by Saiikara and Nagarjuna. Calcutta, 1973.
201.Johansson R.E. The Dynamic Psychology of Early Buddhism. London-New Delhi, 1978.
201a. Jones W.The Eleventh Anniversary Discource, on the Philosophy of the Asiatics, Delivered 20th of February, 1794.— The Works of Sir William Jones. L, 1799. Vol. 1.
202.Junankar N.S. Gautama the Nyaya Philosopher. Delhi, 1978.
203.Kar B. The Theories of Error in Indian Philosophy: An Analytical Study. Delhi, 1978.
204.Karunadasa Y. Buddhist Analysis of Matter. Colombo, 1967.
205.Keith A.B. Indian Logic and Atomism: An Exposition of the Nyaya and Vaisesika Systems. Oxf., 1921.
206.Keith A.B. The Religion and Philosophy of the Vedas and Upanisads. Cambridge (Mass.), 1925.
207.Keith A.B. The Samkhya System: A History of the Samkhya Philosophy. 2nd ed. Calcutta, 1949.
208.Kneale A/., Kneale W.The Development of Logic. Oxf., 1962.
209.Kochumutton T.A. A Buddhist Doctrine of Experience: A New Translation and Interpretation of the Works of Vasubandhu the Yogacarin. Delhi, 1982.
210.Kunst A. Probleme der buddhistischen Logik in der Darstellung der Tattvasarngriha. Krak6w, 1939.
320
211.Lewis C.I. The Calculus of Strict Implication. — Mind. 1914, vol. 23, X° 90.
212.Lewis C.I. Implication and the Algebra of Logic. — Mind. 1912, vol. 21, № 84.
213.Lewis D.K. Counterfactuals. Cambridge (Mass.), 1973.
214. Long A. A. Freedom and Determinism in the Stoic Theory of Human Action.— Long A.A., Rist J.M., Watson G. a.o. Problems in Stoicism. L., 1971.
215.Mahadevana T.M.P. Gaudapada: A Study in Early Advaita. 2nd ed. Madras, 1954.
216.Mates B. Stoic Logic. Berkeley-Los Angeles, 1961.
217.Matilal B.K. The Central Philosophy of Jainism (Anekanta-vada). Ahmedabad, 1981.
218.Matilal B.K. Epistemology, Logic and Grammar in Indian Philosophical Analysis. The Hague-Paris, 1971.
219.Matilal B.K. Logic, Language and Reality: An Introduction to Indian Philosophical Studies. Delhi, 1985.
220.Matilal B.K. The Navya-Nyaya Doctrine of Negation: The Semantics and Ontology of Negative Statements in Navya-Nyaya Philosophy. Cambridge (Mass.), 1968.
221.Matilal B.K. Reference and Existence in Nyaya and Buddhist Logic. — Journal of Indian Philosophy. 1970, vo). ), № 1.
222.McCall S. Connexive Implication.— Journal of Symbolic Logic. 1966, vol.31, №3.
223.Mehta M.L. Outlines of Jaina Philosophy: The Essentials of Jaina Onthology, Epistemology and Ethics. Bangalore, 1954.
224.Mraz M. К implikaci v Aristotelove logice. Praha, 1988.
225.MudgalS.G. Advaita of Samkaracarya Reappraisal: Impact of Buddhism and Samkhya on Samkara's Thought. Delhi, 1975.
226.Nikhilananda S. The Realistic Aspect in Indian Spirituality. — The Indian Mind. Honolulu, 1967.
227.Oldenberg H. Buddha: Sein Leben, seine Lehre, seine Gemeinde. В., 1881.
228.Oldenberg H. Die Lehre der Upanischaden und die Anfange des Buddhismus. Guttingen, 1915.
229.Pandeya R.C. The Problem of Meaning in Indian Philosophy. Delhi, 1963.
230.PathakKB. Dharmaklrti and Samkaracarya. — Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. 1891, vol. 18, № XLVIII.
231.Pathak KB. Was Bhartrhari a Buddhist? — Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. 1891, vol. 18, № L.
232.Pears D. Synthetic Necessary Truth. — Mind. 1950, vol. 59, № 235.
233.PerretR.W. The Problem of Induction in Indian Philosophy.— Philosophy East and West. 1984, vol. 34, № 2.
234.Perszyk K.J. The Nyaya and Russel on Empty Terms. — Philosophy East and West. 1984, vol. 34, №2.
235.Popper K.R. A Note on Natural Laws and So-called Contrary-to-fact Conditionals. — Mind. 1949, vol. 58, № 229.
236.Potter K.H. Some Thoughts of the Nyaya Conception of Meaning. — Journal of Indian Philosophy. 1975, vol. 3, № 1/2.
237.Potter K.H. The Backgrounds of Sceptisism, East and West. — Journal of Indian Philosophy. 1975, vol. 3, № 3/4.
238.Prantl С Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande. Vol. I-IV. В., 1955.
239.Prior A.N. The Logic of Negative Terms in Boethius. — Franciscan Studies. 1953, vol. 13, № 1.
321
240. Prior A.N. Past, Present and Future. Oxf, 1967.
241.Rqju P.T. Introductionto Comparative Philosophy. Lincoln, 1962.
242.Randle H.N. Indian Logic in the Early Schools. Oxf, 1930.
243.Randle H.N. A Note on the Indian Syllogism. — Mind. 1924, vol. 33, № 132.
244.Reichenbach H. Elements of Symbolic Logic. N.Y., 1947.
245.Reichenbach H. Nomological Statements and Admissible Operations. Amsterdam, 1954.
246.Reichenbach H. The Theory of Probability: An Inquiry into the Logical and Mathematical Foundations or the Calculus Probability. English transl. by H.Hutter and M. Reichenbach. Berkeley-Los Angeles, 1949.
247.Rhys Davids T.V. Buddhism. Being a Sketch of the Life and Teaching of Gautama the Buddha. A new revised ed. L., 1910.
248.Rhys Davids T. V. Buddhist India. 3rd. ed. Calcutta, 1957.
249.RistJ.M. Stoic Philosophy. London-New York, 1969.
250.Saksena S.K. Relation of Philosophical Theories to the Practical Affairs of Men. — The Indian Mind. Honolulu, 1967.
251.Sastri P.S. Indian Idealism: Epistemology and Ontology. Delhi-Varanasi, 19751976.
252.Scherbatsky Th. Buddhist Logic. Vol. I—II. Leningrad, 1930-1932.
253.Schmithausen L Alayavijnana: On the Origin and Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogachara Philosophy. Tokyo, 1987.
254.Seal B. The Positive Sciences of Ancient Hindus. Delhi, 1958 (reprint).
255.Sharma D. The Differentiation Theory of Meaning in Indian Logic. The HagueParis, 1969.
256.Sharma D. The Negative Dialectics of India: A Study of the Negative Dialecticism in Indian Philosophy. East Lancing (Mich.), 1970.
257.Shastri D.N. Critique of Indian Realism: A Study of the Conflict between the Nyaya-Vaisesika and the Buddhist Dignaga School. Agra, 1964.
258. Sheldon W.H. Main Contrasts between Eastern and Western Philosophy. — Essays in East-West Philosophy. Honolulu, 1951.
259.Sinari R.A. The Structure of Indian Thought. Springfield (111.), 1970.
260.Smart N. Action and Suffering in the Theravadin Tradition. — Philosophy East and West. 1984, vol. 34, №4.
261.Sprung M. The Madhyamika Doctrine of Two Realities as a Metaphysics. —The Problem of Two Truths in Buddhism and Vedanta. Dordrecht-Boston, 1973.
262.Siaal F. Universals: Studies in Indian Logic and Linguistics. Chicago-London, 1988.
263.Stafford Betty L Nagarjuna's Masterpiece — Logical, Mystical, Both or Neither. — Philosophy East and West. 1983, vol. 33, № 2.
264.Streng F.J. The Buddhist Doctrine of Two Truth as Religious Philosophy. — Journal of Indian Philosophy. 1970, vol. 1, № 3.
265.Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition: Proceedings of the 2nd International Dharmaklrti Conference. Vienna, June 11-16, 1989. Wien, 1991.
266.Suffering: Indian Perspectives. Ed. by K.N, Tiwari. Delhi, 1986.
267.Tripathi C.L The Problem of Knowledge in Yogachara Buddhism. Varanasi, 1972.
268.Tucci G. Buddhist Logic before Dignaga (Asanga, Vasubandhu, Tarka-sastras). — Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. 1929, № 3.
269.Tucci G. On Some Aspects of the Doctrines of Maitreyanatha and Asanga. Calcutta, 1930.
322
270.Vidyabhusana S.C. A History of Indian Logic: Ancient, Medieval and Modern Schools. Calcutta, 1921.
271.VostrikovA. The Nyayavarttika of Uddyotakara and the Vadanyaya of Dharmaklrti. — Indian Historical Quarterly. 1935, vol. 11.
272.Warder A.K. The Earliest Indian Logic.—Труды 25-го международного конгресса востоковедов. Т. IV. М., 1963.
273.Watson G. The Natural Law and Stoicism. — Problems in Stoicism. L., 1971.
274.Zabolotnych E.L Zur Vergleichung der Erkenntnisstheorien von I.Kant und altindischen Buddhisten. — Abstracts of all-Russian Conference "Frege's and Hilbert's Heritage in the 20th cent. (Logic, Philosophy and Mathematics)". Kaliningrad, 1992.
275.Zeller E. Die Philosophic der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung. 3. Aufl. Lpz., 1869-1881.
SUMMARY
The edition consists of two works on mediaeval Indian epistemology and logic.
The author of the first one, Natalia A. Kanayeva, bases her research of logical theories on the material of AnumanaparTksa, a topic from the treatise Tattvasamgraha by an outstanding Buddhist philosopher Santaraksita (8th cent. AD), later supplied with commentary by his disciple KamalasTla. Russian translation of Anumanapanksa is for the first time published in this edition. The research starts with a survey of the theory of pramana-vada, the means of obtaining true knowledge, that is the corner-stone of Indian epistemology and logic. The analysis of AnumanaparTksa shows the distinctive features of Indian inference and logic; basing her reasoning on this text, the author comes to the conclusion that it has introduced evolutionary changes in logical theories, especially the transition from intensionalism to extensionalism. A short glossary of logical terms is appended.
Elina L. Zabolotnykh studies the theory of demonstration and syllogism, suggested by Buddhist philosopher Dignaga (6th cent. AD) and later developed by his adherents DharmakTrti and Dharmottara. The author pays attention to the formal aspect of anumana, inference, and compares the results of theoretical studies, carried out by Indian logicians, with achievements of Aristotle and later Western philosophers. She also suggests a new interpretation of Buddhist inference doctrine, which is based on modern logical theories.
ОГЛАВЛЕНИЕ
Предварительные замечания.
Н.А.Канаева.
Проблема выводного знания в Индии и ее решение в «Таттвасанграхе» Шантаракшиты с комментарием «Панджика» Камалашилы
Введение |
|
12 |
Г л а в а |
I. Способ постановки проблемы выводного знания |
|
в индийской философии |
15 |
|
§ 1. Периодизация истории эпистемологии и логики в Индии. |
|
|
Краткая характеристика периодов |
15 |
|
§ 2. Особенности прамана-вады. Обоснование выделения двух |
|
|
аспектов проблемы выводного знания |
29 |
|
§ 3. К вопросу об употреблении термина «индийская логика» |
75 |
|
Г л а в а |
II. Решение проблемы вывода Шантаракшитой |
|
и Камалашилой |
78 |
|
§ 1. Шантаракшита и его «Таттвасанграха». Камалашила иего |
|
|
«Панджика» |
78 |
|
§ 2. Гносеологический аспект проблемы выводного знания |
|
|
в «Таттвасанграхе» и «Панджике» |
83 |
|
Г л а в а |
Ш. Логический аспект проблемы выводного знания |
91 |
§ 1. Полемика буддистов с мимансаками и санкхьяиками |
|
|
о типологии вывода |
91 |
|
§ 2. Полемика буддистов с найяиками о членах силлогизма |
99 |
|
§ 3. Полемика буддистов с джайнами о правилах вывода |
106 |
|
Некоторые выводы |
127 |
|
Структура «Ануманапарикши» |
130 |
|
Шантаракшита. «Таттвасанграха» с комментарием
«Панджика» Камалашилы. Глава «Ануманапарикша» («Рассмотре-
ние вывода»). Перевод Н.А.Канаевой |
132 |
Словарь специальных терминов |
184 |
Библиография |
198 |
325
Э.Л.Заболотных.
Логико-эпистемологические воззрения Дигнаги и его идейных преемников
Введение |
210 |
|
Г л а в а |
I. Этапы формирования и эволюции индийской логики |
216 |
§ 1. Представления индийских мыслителей о задачах логики. |
|
|
«Предлогический» периоде истории «прамана-вады» |
216 |
|
§ 2. Основные особенности философии классической ньяи |
219 |
|
§ 3. Логические идеи буддистов «раннего» и ((среднего» периодов |
|
|
(1 в. до н.э. — IV в. н.э.) |
221 |
|
§ 4. Творческая деятельность Дигнаги и его преемников: |
|
|
основные нововведения |
223 |
|
|
A. Трактовки сущности восприятия и мышления |
226 |
|
Б. Классификация выводов по функциональному признаку. |
|
|
Новая модель силлогистического доказательства |
230 |
|
B. Представление о природе «неразрывной связи» |
232 |
|
Г. Формулировка правил подбора среднего термина силлогизма... |
233 |
|
Д. Учение о негативном содержании понятий (apoha-vada) |
234 |
§ 5. Логическая мысль в Индии в постбуддийскую эпоху |
237 |
|
Г л а в а |
П. Индийские модели выводов |
239 |
§ 1. Структура умозаключения |
239 |
|
§ 2. Критерии корректности вывода |
246 |
|
§ 3. Варианты классификации умозаключений |
254 |
|
Г л а в а |
III. Современный взгляд на индийскую логику |
278 |
§ 1. «Колесо причин» Дигнаги: принципы построения |
|
|
и формальные аналоги |
278 |
|
|
A. Реестр Дигнаги |
278 |
|
Б. Реестр Уддйотакары |
290 |
|
B. Формальные критерии корректности вывода |
297 |
§ 2. Неклассические компоненты в индийской логике |
300 |
|
Список сокращений |
310 |
|
Библиография |
312 |
|
Summary |
324 |
|
Научное издание
Канаева Наталия Алексеевна
ПРОБЛЕМА ВЫВОДНОГО ЗНАНИЯ В ИНДИИ
Заболотных Элина Леонидовна
ЛОГИКО-ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ВОЗЗРЕНИЯ ДИГНАГИ И ЕГО ИДЕЙНЫХ ПРЕЕМНИКОВ
Утверждено кпечати |
|
Институтом философии РАН |
, |
РедакторТ.А.Дубянская |
|
Художник Э.Л.Эрман |
|
Технический редактор О.В.Волкова
Корректоры М.К.Киселева, Е.И.Крошкина
Компьютерная версткаU. П. Горшенкова
Подписано к печати 09.10.02 |
|
Формат 60х90'/|6 |
|
Печать офсетная. Усл. п. л. 20,5 |
|
Усл. кр.-отт. 20,8. Уч.-изд. л. 21,2 |
|
Тираж 1000 экз. Изд. № 7964 |
' '* |
Зак. № 6938 |
••••* • |
Издательская фирма «Восточная литература» РАН
127051, Москва К-51, Цветной бульвар, 21(
ППП "Типография "Наука"
121099, Москва Г-99, Шубинский пер., 6