Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
5 курс / Хирургия детская / Hirschsprung disease.pdf
Скачиваний:
10
Добавлен:
24.03.2024
Размер:
5.58 Mб
Скачать

Primer

 

 

1920s: Identi ication

 

 

1956: Retro-rectal pull-through

1960: Sigmoid resection and colorectal

 

 

of aganglionosis

 

 

(Bernard Duhamel)

anastomosis (Fritz Rehbein)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1880s

1920s

1930s

1940s

1950s

1960s

1990s

2000s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1886: First description

 

 

 

1949: First pull-through

1952–1964: Submucosal dissection

 

 

2000: Total transanal

by Harald Hirschsprung

 

(Orvar Swenson)

(Asa Yancey–Franco Soave)

 

 

(Jacob Langer–

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Luis De la Torre Mondragón)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 2 | Timeline of key advances in the history of Hirschsprung disease.

In 1886, Harald Hirschsprung first presented the cases of two infants who died of what we now identify as Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis225. In the 1920s, Dalla Valle identified the absence of ganglion cells in the distal bowel and the presence of ganglion cells in the proximal bowel225. Orvar Swenson performed the first successful resection and pull-through for HSCR in 1949, which was

1994–1995: Laparoscopy-assisted pull-through (Thom Lobe–Keith Georgeson)

followed by technical variations of pull-through presented by Duhamel, Yancey, Soave and Rehbein79,11,12. Laparoscopic approaches were described by Lobe and Georgeson in the mid-1990s, followed by fully transanal approaches by

De la Torre Mondragón and Langer in 2000 (refs. 1316). Notably, the earliest description of what we now refer to as Hirschsprung disease is found in the ancient Hindu text ‘Sushruta Samhita’, dating to 1200–600 bce226.

are found in RET or EDNRB or genes encoding transcription factors related to these genes (see below)38.

Family history. Families with a history of HSCR have an increased risk of recurrence, with affected families carrying a risk 200 times higher (estimated ~4%) than the general population33. This risk is even higher for long-segment HSCR, for which recurrence rates can be as high as 20–50%33. High-penetrance RET mutations — in coding sequence and enhancer regions — are involved in ~45–50% of cases of familial HSCR33,38. Loss-of-function RET mutations are found more often in familial HSCR than in sporadic HSCR. Non-affected parents can still be carriers of the mutations in families with a history of HSCR40.

Associated congenital anomalies. Associated congenital anomalies are often observed in children with HSCR, although they have been under-reportedinthepast.Theoverallincidenceofassociatedanomalies is estimated to be ~20–30%38,41,42. However, current studies have found increased incidence owing to active screening42. The most common anomalies are visual and ophthalmological (43%), such as hyperopia (29%) or astigmatism (26%), but their prevalence is also high in the generalpopulation42.Congenitalanomaliesofthekidneyandurinarytract are also commonly observed, affecting 14–21% of patients with HSCR, and routine screening for these conditions is now recommended43,44. Gastrointestinal tract anomalies such as malrotation, anorectal malformationsandintestinalatresiahavebeendetectedin2.8%ofpatients withHSCR42.Otherassociatedanomaliesincludecardiacdefectsin5%of patients(septaldefects),hearingimpairmentin5%andcentralnervous system anomalies in 2% (corpus callosum agenesis)42.

Table 1 | Prevalence of Hirschsprung disease according to ethnic background

Ethnic background

Prevalence (per 10,000 births)

Refs.

 

 

 

Hispanic

1.0–2.0

23

 

 

 

White American

1.5–2.6

23,28

 

 

 

African American

2.1–4.0

23,28

 

 

 

Paci ic Islander

5.4

26

 

 

 

Asian

2.2–2.8

20,28

 

 

 

Mechanisms/pathophysiology

Enteric nervous system development

The ENS is composed of >100 million enteric neurons (also known as ganglion cells) and glial cells, organized into two plexuses — the myenteric plexus between the longitudinal and circular muscle layers (Auerbach plexus) and the submucosal plexus between the mucosal and circular muscle layers (Meissner plexus). During embryonic development, the cells that form the ENS derive from the neural crest. The neural crest is a temporary structure that arises from the dorsal region of the neural tube and is located along the entire length of the body axis. In humans, vagal NCCs migrate from the oesophagus to the anal canal between the fourth and the seventh weeks of gestation45,46, forming the myenteric plexus outside the circular muscle layer by the 12th week of gestation and the submucosal plexus between the 12th and 16th weeks of gestation47 (Fig. 3). Although vagal NCCs are the primary source of enteric ganglion cells, studies have demonstrated additional sources and migrational routes for subsets of enteric neurons in animal models48,49.

Normal ENS development relies on a precise balance of migration, proliferation and differentiation of NCCs, which is controlled by intrinsic properties of the cells and extrinsic factors in the microenvironment45. The directional migration of NCCs from the vagal region of the dorsal neural tube is driven by extracellular signals such as retinoic acid and Hox transcription factors5052. The migration of NCCs is complete by the seventh week of gestation in humans, embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) in mice and 72 h after fertilization in zebrafish45,53. A critical number of enteric NCCs is needed to maintain cell-to-cell contact to drive migration. Diminished proliferation and premature differentiation of the enteric NCCs can lead to incomplete migration and consequently result in HSCR54. Owing to the complexity of this process, a number ofdifferent perturbations along the ENS developmental pathway can lead to the pathogenesis of HSCR55.

Signalling pathways in HSCR

Several signalling pathways that regulate the migration of NCCs are involved in the development of HSCR. RET and EDNRB are the two most common genes associated with HSCR development5. During development, signalling between RET (expressed in NCCs) and GDNF (ligand for RET produced in the gut mesenchyme) is important for the growth, survival and directional movement of enteric NCCs53.

Nature Reviews Disease Primers |

(2023) 9:54

4

Primer

Similarly, the signalling pathway between EDNRB (encoding endothe-

which leads to distal aganglionosis due to diminished migration of

lin receptor type B) and its ligand, EDN3, is important for maintaining

enteric NCCs66. This finding suggests that the location of COL6A3

enteric NCCs in an undifferentiated, proliferative state56,57. Perturba-

(encoding collagen VI) on chromosome 21 might be one of the rea-

tions in this signalling pathway can lead to premature differentiation

sons for the increased incidence of HSCR in patients with trisomy 21

and disruption of normal migration, resulting in HSCR. Mutations in

(ref. 67). Some extracellular matrix components, such as collagen VI,

EDNRB can cause Shah–Waardenburg syndrome, a condition char-

collagen IX, laminin, agrin and versican, have been reported to impede

acterized by congenital deafness, pigmentation abnormalities and

normal NCC migration, whereas other components, such as collagen I,

HSCR. In mice, homozygous loss of function of Ednrb leads to a com-

collagen XVIII, tenascin, vitronectin and fibronectin, have been found

mon model of HSCR called the piebald lethal mouse, whereas loss of

to promote migration57,66,6874. This composition of the extracellular

function mutations in Edn3 results in another model called the lethal

matrix also affects neuroglial differentiation75. In turn, enteric NCCs

spotted mouse58.

can influence their environment by secreting matrix metallopro-

Studies have demonstrated a role for the transcription factors

teinases that modify the extracellular matrix to promote migration.

SOX10 and PHOX2B in HSCR development. SOX10, expressed by

Thus, the normal development of the ENS is the result of a complex

early-migrating enteric NCCs, maintains NCCs in a proliferative pro-

interplay between enteric progenitor cells and the extracellular

genitor state. Homozygous loss of Sox10 results in total intestinal agan-

environment.

glionosis, whereas heterozygosity results in distal aganglionosis59,60.

HSCR is primarily caused by the incomplete migration of vagal

By contrast, PHOX2B, expressed by late-migrating enteric NCCs, pro-

NCCs from cranial to caudal direction during development, although

motes proliferation while driving NCCs towards a neuronal lineage61.

other progenitor cell populations might also be involved. In addi-

In humans, PHOX2B variants are associated with congenital central

tion to vagal NCCs, the sacral neural crest also contributes to neu-

hypoventilation syndrome, characterized by a loss of involuntary con-

rons and glia of the pelvic plexus, and may also contribute to HSCR

trol of respiration and an increased incidence of HSCR62,63. The pattern-

pathogenesis48,7679. However, the exact role of the sacral neural crest

ing of the ENS in humans into two plexuses involves several pathways,

in disease pathogenesis is still unknown. Schwann cell precursors may

including sonic hedgehog, Indian hedgehog, bone morphogenetic

also play a part in HSCR pathophysiology, as a proportion of neurons

protein and netrin47,64.

and glia in the colorectum seem to be derived from the population

Role of extracellular matrix in HSCR. Environmental factors in

of cells that migrate along extrinsic nerve fibres49,80. These findings

suggest that ENS development and the pathogenesis of HSCR may be

the vicinity of migrating NCCs also have a crucial role in the normal

more complex than previously postulated. A better understanding of

development of the ENS65. For example, the Holstein mouse model

the pathophysiological mechanisms of HSCR may uncover pathways

carries a mutation that increases the expression of collagen VI,

for future targeted therapy.

Table 2 | Genetic syndromes with a strong association with Hirschsprung disease

Syndrome name

Prevalence in the general

Gene or chromosome involved

Inheritance

Orphanet code

Refs.

 

population

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Down syndrome

1:400–3,000

Trisomy 21

Not applicable

870

209

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mowat–Wilson syndrome

1:50,000–70,000

ZFHX1B

Dominant

261552

210

 

 

 

 

 

 

Waardenburg–Shah syndrome (type 4A)

<1:1,000,000

EDNRB

Recessive

897

211,212

 

 

 

 

 

 

Waardenburg–Shah (type 4C)

<1:1,000,000

SOX10

Dominant

897

212

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEN2A

1:30,000

RET (RETMEN2A oncoprotein)

Dominant

247698

213

 

 

 

 

 

 

Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome

1:20,000–40,000

DHCR7

Recessive

818

214

 

 

 

 

 

 

L1 syndrome

1:30,000

L1CAM

Recessive (X-linked)

275543

215

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bardet–Biedl syndrome

1:45,000–100,000

BBS1BBS11

Recessive

156183

216

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congenital hypoventilation syndrome

1:200,000

PHOX2B

Dominant

661

217

(Haddad)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cartilage–hair hypoplasia

1:23,000 (Finland, Amish

RMRP

Recessive

175

218

 

community in the USA)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goldberg–Sphrintzen syndrome

<1:1,000,000

KIAA1279

Recessive

2462

219

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pitt–Hopkins syndrome

1:300,000

TCF4

Dominant

2896

220

 

 

 

 

 

 

BRESEK/BRESHECK syndrome

<1:1,000,000

MBTPS2

Recessive (X-linked)

85284

221

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kaufman–McKusick syndrome

Unknown

MKKS

Recessive

2473

222

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other (>30 syndromes)

4%

Deletions

Dominant and/or

Not applicable

82

 

 

Duplications

recessive

 

 

 

 

Translocations

 

 

 

Data were obtained from refs. 33,90,223; for an extensive list, see ref. 82; for description of all diseases, see ref. 224.

Nature Reviews Disease Primers |

(2023) 9:54

5

Соседние файлы в папке Хирургия детская