- •Preface
- •Imaging Microscopic Features
- •Measuring the Crystal Structure
- •References
- •Contents
- •1.4 Simulating the Effects of Elastic Scattering: Monte Carlo Calculations
- •What Are the Main Features of the Beam Electron Interaction Volume?
- •How Does the Interaction Volume Change with Composition?
- •How Does the Interaction Volume Change with Incident Beam Energy?
- •How Does the Interaction Volume Change with Specimen Tilt?
- •1.5 A Range Equation To Estimate the Size of the Interaction Volume
- •References
- •2: Backscattered Electrons
- •2.1 Origin
- •2.2.1 BSE Response to Specimen Composition (η vs. Atomic Number, Z)
- •SEM Image Contrast with BSE: “Atomic Number Contrast”
- •SEM Image Contrast: “BSE Topographic Contrast—Number Effects”
- •2.2.3 Angular Distribution of Backscattering
- •Beam Incident at an Acute Angle to the Specimen Surface (Specimen Tilt > 0°)
- •SEM Image Contrast: “BSE Topographic Contrast—Trajectory Effects”
- •2.2.4 Spatial Distribution of Backscattering
- •Depth Distribution of Backscattering
- •Radial Distribution of Backscattered Electrons
- •2.3 Summary
- •References
- •3: Secondary Electrons
- •3.1 Origin
- •3.2 Energy Distribution
- •3.3 Escape Depth of Secondary Electrons
- •3.8 Spatial Characteristics of Secondary Electrons
- •References
- •4: X-Rays
- •4.1 Overview
- •4.2 Characteristic X-Rays
- •4.2.1 Origin
- •4.2.2 Fluorescence Yield
- •4.2.3 X-Ray Families
- •4.2.4 X-Ray Nomenclature
- •4.2.6 Characteristic X-Ray Intensity
- •Isolated Atoms
- •X-Ray Production in Thin Foils
- •X-Ray Intensity Emitted from Thick, Solid Specimens
- •4.3 X-Ray Continuum (bremsstrahlung)
- •4.3.1 X-Ray Continuum Intensity
- •4.3.3 Range of X-ray Production
- •4.4 X-Ray Absorption
- •4.5 X-Ray Fluorescence
- •References
- •5.1 Electron Beam Parameters
- •5.2 Electron Optical Parameters
- •5.2.1 Beam Energy
- •Landing Energy
- •5.2.2 Beam Diameter
- •5.2.3 Beam Current
- •5.2.4 Beam Current Density
- •5.2.5 Beam Convergence Angle, α
- •5.2.6 Beam Solid Angle
- •5.2.7 Electron Optical Brightness, β
- •Brightness Equation
- •5.2.8 Focus
- •Astigmatism
- •5.3 SEM Imaging Modes
- •5.3.1 High Depth-of-Field Mode
- •5.3.2 High-Current Mode
- •5.3.3 Resolution Mode
- •5.3.4 Low-Voltage Mode
- •5.4 Electron Detectors
- •5.4.1 Important Properties of BSE and SE for Detector Design and Operation
- •Abundance
- •Angular Distribution
- •Kinetic Energy Response
- •5.4.2 Detector Characteristics
- •Angular Measures for Electron Detectors
- •Elevation (Take-Off) Angle, ψ, and Azimuthal Angle, ζ
- •Solid Angle, Ω
- •Energy Response
- •Bandwidth
- •5.4.3 Common Types of Electron Detectors
- •Backscattered Electrons
- •Passive Detectors
- •Scintillation Detectors
- •Semiconductor BSE Detectors
- •5.4.4 Secondary Electron Detectors
- •Everhart–Thornley Detector
- •Through-the-Lens (TTL) Electron Detectors
- •TTL SE Detector
- •TTL BSE Detector
- •Measuring the DQE: BSE Semiconductor Detector
- •References
- •6: Image Formation
- •6.1 Image Construction by Scanning Action
- •6.2 Magnification
- •6.3 Making Dimensional Measurements With the SEM: How Big Is That Feature?
- •Using a Calibrated Structure in ImageJ-Fiji
- •6.4 Image Defects
- •6.4.1 Projection Distortion (Foreshortening)
- •6.4.2 Image Defocusing (Blurring)
- •6.5 Making Measurements on Surfaces With Arbitrary Topography: Stereomicroscopy
- •6.5.1 Qualitative Stereomicroscopy
- •Fixed beam, Specimen Position Altered
- •Fixed Specimen, Beam Incidence Angle Changed
- •6.5.2 Quantitative Stereomicroscopy
- •Measuring a Simple Vertical Displacement
- •References
- •7: SEM Image Interpretation
- •7.1 Information in SEM Images
- •7.2.2 Calculating Atomic Number Contrast
- •Establishing a Robust Light-Optical Analogy
- •Getting It Wrong: Breaking the Light-Optical Analogy of the Everhart–Thornley (Positive Bias) Detector
- •Deconstructing the SEM/E–T Image of Topography
- •SUM Mode (A + B)
- •DIFFERENCE Mode (A−B)
- •References
- •References
- •9: Image Defects
- •9.1 Charging
- •9.1.1 What Is Specimen Charging?
- •9.1.3 Techniques to Control Charging Artifacts (High Vacuum Instruments)
- •Observing Uncoated Specimens
- •Coating an Insulating Specimen for Charge Dissipation
- •Choosing the Coating for Imaging Morphology
- •9.2 Radiation Damage
- •9.3 Contamination
- •References
- •10: High Resolution Imaging
- •10.2 Instrumentation Considerations
- •10.4.1 SE Range Effects Produce Bright Edges (Isolated Edges)
- •10.4.4 Too Much of a Good Thing: The Bright Edge Effect Hinders Locating the True Position of an Edge for Critical Dimension Metrology
- •10.5.1 Beam Energy Strategies
- •Low Beam Energy Strategy
- •High Beam Energy Strategy
- •Making More SE1: Apply a Thin High-δ Metal Coating
- •Making Fewer BSEs, SE2, and SE3 by Eliminating Bulk Scattering From the Substrate
- •10.6 Factors That Hinder Achieving High Resolution
- •10.6.2 Pathological Specimen Behavior
- •Contamination
- •Instabilities
- •References
- •11: Low Beam Energy SEM
- •11.3 Selecting the Beam Energy to Control the Spatial Sampling of Imaging Signals
- •11.3.1 Low Beam Energy for High Lateral Resolution SEM
- •11.3.2 Low Beam Energy for High Depth Resolution SEM
- •11.3.3 Extremely Low Beam Energy Imaging
- •References
- •12.1.1 Stable Electron Source Operation
- •12.1.2 Maintaining Beam Integrity
- •12.1.4 Minimizing Contamination
- •12.3.1 Control of Specimen Charging
- •12.5 VPSEM Image Resolution
- •References
- •13: ImageJ and Fiji
- •13.1 The ImageJ Universe
- •13.2 Fiji
- •13.3 Plugins
- •13.4 Where to Learn More
- •References
- •14: SEM Imaging Checklist
- •14.1.1 Conducting or Semiconducting Specimens
- •14.1.2 Insulating Specimens
- •14.2 Electron Signals Available
- •14.2.1 Beam Electron Range
- •14.2.2 Backscattered Electrons
- •14.2.3 Secondary Electrons
- •14.3 Selecting the Electron Detector
- •14.3.2 Backscattered Electron Detectors
- •14.3.3 “Through-the-Lens” Detectors
- •14.4 Selecting the Beam Energy for SEM Imaging
- •14.4.4 High Resolution SEM Imaging
- •Strategy 1
- •Strategy 2
- •14.5 Selecting the Beam Current
- •14.5.1 High Resolution Imaging
- •14.5.2 Low Contrast Features Require High Beam Current and/or Long Frame Time to Establish Visibility
- •14.6 Image Presentation
- •14.6.1 “Live” Display Adjustments
- •14.6.2 Post-Collection Processing
- •14.7 Image Interpretation
- •14.7.1 Observer’s Point of View
- •14.7.3 Contrast Encoding
- •14.8.1 VPSEM Advantages
- •14.8.2 VPSEM Disadvantages
- •15: SEM Case Studies
- •15.1 Case Study: How High Is That Feature Relative to Another?
- •15.2 Revealing Shallow Surface Relief
- •16.1.2 Minor Artifacts: The Si-Escape Peak
- •16.1.3 Minor Artifacts: Coincidence Peaks
- •16.1.4 Minor Artifacts: Si Absorption Edge and Si Internal Fluorescence Peak
- •16.2 “Best Practices” for Electron-Excited EDS Operation
- •16.2.1 Operation of the EDS System
- •Choosing the EDS Time Constant (Resolution and Throughput)
- •Choosing the Solid Angle of the EDS
- •Selecting a Beam Current for an Acceptable Level of System Dead-Time
- •16.3.1 Detector Geometry
- •16.3.2 Process Time
- •16.3.3 Optimal Working Distance
- •16.3.4 Detector Orientation
- •16.3.5 Count Rate Linearity
- •16.3.6 Energy Calibration Linearity
- •16.3.7 Other Items
- •16.3.8 Setting Up a Quality Control Program
- •Using the QC Tools Within DTSA-II
- •Creating a QC Project
- •Linearity of Output Count Rate with Live-Time Dose
- •Resolution and Peak Position Stability with Count Rate
- •Solid Angle for Low X-ray Flux
- •Maximizing Throughput at Moderate Resolution
- •References
- •17: DTSA-II EDS Software
- •17.1 Getting Started With NIST DTSA-II
- •17.1.1 Motivation
- •17.1.2 Platform
- •17.1.3 Overview
- •17.1.4 Design
- •Simulation
- •Quantification
- •Experiment Design
- •Modeled Detectors (. Fig. 17.1)
- •Window Type (. Fig. 17.2)
- •The Optimal Working Distance (. Figs. 17.3 and 17.4)
- •Elevation Angle
- •Sample-to-Detector Distance
- •Detector Area
- •Crystal Thickness
- •Number of Channels, Energy Scale, and Zero Offset
- •Resolution at Mn Kα (Approximate)
- •Azimuthal Angle
- •Gold Layer, Aluminum Layer, Nickel Layer
- •Dead Layer
- •Zero Strobe Discriminator (. Figs. 17.7 and 17.8)
- •Material Editor Dialog (. Figs. 17.9, 17.10, 17.11, 17.12, 17.13, and 17.14)
- •17.2.1 Introduction
- •17.2.2 Monte Carlo Simulation
- •17.2.4 Optional Tables
- •References
- •18: Qualitative Elemental Analysis by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry
- •18.1 Quality Assurance Issues for Qualitative Analysis: EDS Calibration
- •18.2 Principles of Qualitative EDS Analysis
- •Exciting Characteristic X-Rays
- •Fluorescence Yield
- •X-ray Absorption
- •Si Escape Peak
- •Coincidence Peaks
- •18.3 Performing Manual Qualitative Analysis
- •Beam Energy
- •Choosing the EDS Resolution (Detector Time Constant)
- •Obtaining Adequate Counts
- •18.4.1 Employ the Available Software Tools
- •18.4.3 Lower Photon Energy Region
- •18.4.5 Checking Your Work
- •18.5 A Worked Example of Manual Peak Identification
- •References
- •19.1 What Is a k-ratio?
- •19.3 Sets of k-ratios
- •19.5 The Analytical Total
- •19.6 Normalization
- •19.7.1 Oxygen by Assumed Stoichiometry
- •19.7.3 Element by Difference
- •19.8 Ways of Reporting Composition
- •19.8.1 Mass Fraction
- •19.8.2 Atomic Fraction
- •19.8.3 Stoichiometry
- •19.8.4 Oxide Fractions
- •Example Calculations
- •19.9 The Accuracy of Quantitative Electron-Excited X-ray Microanalysis
- •19.9.1 Standards-Based k-ratio Protocol
- •19.9.2 “Standardless Analysis”
- •19.10 Appendix
- •19.10.1 The Need for Matrix Corrections To Achieve Quantitative Analysis
- •19.10.2 The Physical Origin of Matrix Effects
- •19.10.3 ZAF Factors in Microanalysis
- •X-ray Generation With Depth, φ(ρz)
- •X-ray Absorption Effect, A
- •X-ray Fluorescence, F
- •References
- •20.2 Instrumentation Requirements
- •20.2.1 Choosing the EDS Parameters
- •EDS Spectrum Channel Energy Width and Spectrum Energy Span
- •EDS Time Constant (Resolution and Throughput)
- •EDS Calibration
- •EDS Solid Angle
- •20.2.2 Choosing the Beam Energy, E0
- •20.2.3 Measuring the Beam Current
- •20.2.4 Choosing the Beam Current
- •Optimizing Analysis Strategy
- •20.3.4 Ba-Ti Interference in BaTiSi3O9
- •20.4 The Need for an Iterative Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Strategy
- •20.4.2 Analysis of a Stainless Steel
- •20.5 Is the Specimen Homogeneous?
- •20.6 Beam-Sensitive Specimens
- •20.6.1 Alkali Element Migration
- •20.6.2 Materials Subject to Mass Loss During Electron Bombardment—the Marshall-Hall Method
- •Thin Section Analysis
- •Bulk Biological and Organic Specimens
- •References
- •21: Trace Analysis by SEM/EDS
- •21.1 Limits of Detection for SEM/EDS Microanalysis
- •21.2.1 Estimating CDL from a Trace or Minor Constituent from Measuring a Known Standard
- •21.2.2 Estimating CDL After Determination of a Minor or Trace Constituent with Severe Peak Interference from a Major Constituent
- •21.3 Measurements of Trace Constituents by Electron-Excited Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry
- •The Inevitable Physics of Remote Excitation Within the Specimen: Secondary Fluorescence Beyond the Electron Interaction Volume
- •Simulation of Long-Range Secondary X-ray Fluorescence
- •NIST DTSA II Simulation: Vertical Interface Between Two Regions of Different Composition in a Flat Bulk Target
- •NIST DTSA II Simulation: Cubic Particle Embedded in a Bulk Matrix
- •21.5 Summary
- •References
- •22.1.2 Low Beam Energy Analysis Range
- •22.2 Advantage of Low Beam Energy X-Ray Microanalysis
- •22.2.1 Improved Spatial Resolution
- •22.3 Challenges and Limitations of Low Beam Energy X-Ray Microanalysis
- •22.3.1 Reduced Access to Elements
- •22.3.3 At Low Beam Energy, Almost Everything Is Found To Be Layered
- •Analysis of Surface Contamination
- •References
- •23: Analysis of Specimens with Special Geometry: Irregular Bulk Objects and Particles
- •23.2.1 No Chemical Etching
- •23.3 Consequences of Attempting Analysis of Bulk Materials With Rough Surfaces
- •23.4.1 The Raw Analytical Total
- •23.4.2 The Shape of the EDS Spectrum
- •23.5 Best Practices for Analysis of Rough Bulk Samples
- •23.6 Particle Analysis
- •Particle Sample Preparation: Bulk Substrate
- •The Importance of Beam Placement
- •Overscanning
- •“Particle Mass Effect”
- •“Particle Absorption Effect”
- •The Analytical Total Reveals the Impact of Particle Effects
- •Does Overscanning Help?
- •23.6.6 Peak-to-Background (P/B) Method
- •Specimen Geometry Severely Affects the k-ratio, but Not the P/B
- •Using the P/B Correspondence
- •23.7 Summary
- •References
- •24: Compositional Mapping
- •24.2 X-Ray Spectrum Imaging
- •24.2.1 Utilizing XSI Datacubes
- •24.2.2 Derived Spectra
- •SUM Spectrum
- •MAXIMUM PIXEL Spectrum
- •24.3 Quantitative Compositional Mapping
- •24.4 Strategy for XSI Elemental Mapping Data Collection
- •24.4.1 Choosing the EDS Dead-Time
- •24.4.2 Choosing the Pixel Density
- •24.4.3 Choosing the Pixel Dwell Time
- •“Flash Mapping”
- •High Count Mapping
- •References
- •25.1 Gas Scattering Effects in the VPSEM
- •25.1.1 Why Doesn’t the EDS Collimator Exclude the Remote Skirt X-Rays?
- •25.2 What Can Be Done To Minimize gas Scattering in VPSEM?
- •25.2.2 Favorable Sample Characteristics
- •Particle Analysis
- •25.2.3 Unfavorable Sample Characteristics
- •References
- •26.1 Instrumentation
- •26.1.2 EDS Detector
- •26.1.3 Probe Current Measurement Device
- •Direct Measurement: Using a Faraday Cup and Picoammeter
- •A Faraday Cup
- •Electrically Isolated Stage
- •Indirect Measurement: Using a Calibration Spectrum
- •26.1.4 Conductive Coating
- •26.2 Sample Preparation
- •26.2.1 Standard Materials
- •26.2.2 Peak Reference Materials
- •26.3 Initial Set-Up
- •26.3.1 Calibrating the EDS Detector
- •Selecting a Pulse Process Time Constant
- •Energy Calibration
- •Quality Control
- •Sample Orientation
- •Detector Position
- •Probe Current
- •26.4 Collecting Data
- •26.4.1 Exploratory Spectrum
- •26.4.2 Experiment Optimization
- •26.4.3 Selecting Standards
- •26.4.4 Reference Spectra
- •26.4.5 Collecting Standards
- •26.4.6 Collecting Peak-Fitting References
- •26.5 Data Analysis
- •26.5.2 Quantification
- •26.6 Quality Check
- •Reference
- •27.2 Case Study: Aluminum Wire Failures in Residential Wiring
- •References
- •28: Cathodoluminescence
- •28.1 Origin
- •28.2 Measuring Cathodoluminescence
- •28.3 Applications of CL
- •28.3.1 Geology
- •Carbonado Diamond
- •Ancient Impact Zircons
- •28.3.2 Materials Science
- •Semiconductors
- •Lead-Acid Battery Plate Reactions
- •28.3.3 Organic Compounds
- •References
- •29.1.1 Single Crystals
- •29.1.2 Polycrystalline Materials
- •29.1.3 Conditions for Detecting Electron Channeling Contrast
- •Specimen Preparation
- •Instrument Conditions
- •29.2.1 Origin of EBSD Patterns
- •29.2.2 Cameras for EBSD Pattern Detection
- •29.2.3 EBSD Spatial Resolution
- •29.2.5 Steps in Typical EBSD Measurements
- •Sample Preparation for EBSD
- •Align Sample in the SEM
- •Check for EBSD Patterns
- •Adjust SEM and Select EBSD Map Parameters
- •Run the Automated Map
- •29.2.6 Display of the Acquired Data
- •29.2.7 Other Map Components
- •29.2.10 Application Example
- •Application of EBSD To Understand Meteorite Formation
- •29.2.11 Summary
- •Specimen Considerations
- •EBSD Detector
- •Selection of Candidate Crystallographic Phases
- •Microscope Operating Conditions and Pattern Optimization
- •Selection of EBSD Acquisition Parameters
- •Collect the Orientation Map
- •References
- •30.1 Introduction
- •30.2 Ion–Solid Interactions
- •30.3 Focused Ion Beam Systems
- •30.5 Preparation of Samples for SEM
- •30.5.1 Cross-Section Preparation
- •30.5.2 FIB Sample Preparation for 3D Techniques and Imaging
- •30.6 Summary
- •References
- •31: Ion Beam Microscopy
- •31.1 What Is So Useful About Ions?
- •31.2 Generating Ion Beams
- •31.3 Signal Generation in the HIM
- •31.5 Patterning with Ion Beams
- •31.7 Chemical Microanalysis with Ion Beams
- •References
- •Appendix
- •A Database of Electron–Solid Interactions
- •A Database of Electron–Solid Interactions
- •Introduction
- •Backscattered Electrons
- •Secondary Yields
- •Stopping Powers
- •X-ray Ionization Cross Sections
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Index
- •Reference List
- •Index
103 |
6 |
6.5 · Making Measurements on Surfaces With Arbitrary Topography: Stereomicroscopy
a |
|
b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c
d
In-focus
Out-of-focus
. Fig. 6.11 a Trivial example of optimal lens strength (focused at blue plane) and defocusing caused by selecting the objective lens strength too high (focused at green plane) and too low (focused at magenta plane) relative to the specimen surface. b Effect of a tilted planar surface. The beam is scanned with fixed objective lens strength, so that different beam diameters encounter the specimen at different
distances along the optic axis. c Effects similar to . Fig. 6.11b but for a three-dimensional specimen of arbitrary shape. d An imaging situation corresponding to . Fig. 6.11c: coated fragments of Mt. St. Helens ash mounted on conducting tape and imaged under high vacuum at E0 = 20 keV with an E–T (positive) detector
6.5.1\ Qualitative Stereomicroscopy
The human visual process creates the perception of depth and the three-dimensional character of objects by combining the separate two-dimensional views provided by the left eye and the right eye to create a fused image, as shown in
. Fig. 6.13. The angular difference between the eyes creates two distinct views containing parallax information, which is the horizontal shift (relative to a vertical axis) of a feature common to the two separate views. The parallax is the critical information that the brain uses to create the sensation of depth in the fused image: the larger the parallax, the closer the object is to the viewer. To create a similar sensation of depth, SEM stereomicroscopy operates by mimicking the
human visual process and creating two angularly separated views of the specimen with parallax information. In SEM imaging, the electron beam is the “eye of the observer” (see the “Image Interpretation” module), so the two required images for stereo imaging must be obtained by either changing the orientation of the beam relative to the specimen (beam rocking method), or by changing the orientation of the specimen relative to the fixed electron beam (specimen tilting method). An appropriate image separation method such as the anaglyph technique (e.g., using red and cyan filters to view color-coded images) then presents the each member of the image pair to the left or right eye so that the viewer’s natural imaging process will create a fused image that reveals the third dimension. (Note that there is a
104\ Chapter 6 · Image Formation
. Fig. 6.12 SEM/E–T (positive) image of a metal fracture surface. The red arrows designate members of a class of flat objects embedded in this surface
6
10 µm
Seeing in three dimensions: stereo vision
“Parallax ”: the shift |
Two views, |
|
between the separate |
||
slightly different |
||
views of the same |
||
orientations |
||
object provided by |
||
|
||
each eye |
|
Our intrepid observer, viewed from above
. Fig. 6.13 Schematic illustration of an observer’s creation of a stereo view of an object. Note that the parallax (shift between the two views) is across a vertical axis
fraction of the population for whom this process is not effective at creating the sense of viewing a three-dimen- sional object.)
Fixed beam, Specimen Position Altered
Parallax can be created by changing the specimen tilt relative to the optic axis (beam) by recording two images with a difference in tilt angle ranging from 2° to 10°. The specific value depends on the degree of topography of the specimen, and the optimum choice may require a trial-and-error approach. Weak topography will generally require a larger tilt difference to create a suitable three-dimensional effect. However, if the tilt angle difference between the images is made too large, it may not be possible for a viewer to successfully fuse the images and visualize the topography, especially for large- scale topography.
A suitable procedure to achieve SEM stereomicroscopy with a fixed beam by tilting the specimen has the following steps:
\1.\ Determine where the tilt axis lies in the SEM image. The eventual images must be presented to the viewer with horizontal parallax (i.e., all the shift between the two images must be across a vertical axis), so the tilt axis must be oriented vertically. The images can be recorded and rotated appropriately within image processing software such as ImageJ-Fiji, or the scan rotation function of the SEM can be used to orient the tilt axis
105 |
6 |
6.5 · Making Measurements on Surfaces With Arbitrary Topography: Stereomicroscopy
. Fig. 6.14 Illustration of the |
RED = LEFT |
main page of the “Anaglyph |
|
Maker STEREOEYE” software |
|
(7 http://www.stereoeye.jp/ |
|
index_e.html) showing the win- |
|
dows where the left (low tilt) and |
|
right (high tilt) SEM/E–T (positive) |
|
images are selected and the |
|
resulting anaglyph (convention: |
|
red filter for the left eye). Note |
|
that brightness and contrast and |
|
fine position adjustments are |
|
available to the user. Specimen: |
|
ceramic fibers, coated with Au-Pd; |
|
E0 = 5 keV |
|
along the vertical. In either case, note the location of the Everhart–Thornley detector in the image, which will provide the general sense of illumination. Ideally, the position of the E–T detector should be at the top of the image. However, after image rotation to orient the tilt axis vertically, the effective position of the EverhartThornley detector is likely to be different from this ideal 12-o’clock position (top center of image).
\2.\ Record an image of the area of interest at the low tilt angle, for example, stage tilt = 0°.
\3.\ Using this image as a reference, increase the tilt angle to the desired value, e.g., stage tilt = 5°, while maintaining the location of the field of view. Depending on the mechanical sophistication of the specimen stage, changing the tilt may cause the field of view to shift laterally, requiring continual relocation of the desired field of view during the tilting process to avoid losing the area of interest, especially at high magnification on specimens with complex topography.
\4.\ The vertical position of the specimen may also shift during tilting. To avoid introducing rotation in the second (high tilt image) by changing the objective lens strength to re-focus, the vertical stage motion (z-axis) should be used to refocus the image. After careful adjustment of the x-y-z position of the stage using the low tilt image to locate the area of interest, record this high tilt image.
\5.\ Within the image-processing software, assign the low tilt image to the RED image channel and the high tilt image to the CYAN (GREEN-BLUE channels combined, or the individual GREEN or BLUE image channels, depending on the type of anaglyph viewing filters available). Apply the image fusion function to create the stereo image, and view this image display with appropriate red (left eye)
and blue (right eye) glasses. Note: The image-processing software may allow fine scale adjustments (shifts and/or rotations) to improve the registration of the images. This procedure is illustrated in . Fig. 6.14 for the “Anaglyph Maker STEREOEYE” software (7 http://www.stereoeye.jp/ index_e.html). Examples of “stereo pairs” created in this manner are shown in . Fig. 6.15 (a particle of ash from the Mt. St. Helens eruption) and . Fig. 6.16 (gypsum crystals from cement).
kNote
While usually successful, this SEM stereomicroscopy “recipe” may not produce the desired stereo effect on your particular instrument. Because of differing conventions for labeling tilt motions or due to unexpected image rotation applied in the software, the sense of the topography may be reversed (e.g., a topographic feature that is an “inner” falsely becomes an “outer” and vice versa). It is good practice when first implementing stereomicroscopy with an SEM to start with a simple specimen with known topography such as a coin with raised lettering or a scratch on a flat surface. Apply the procedure above and inspect the results to determine if the proper sense of the topography has been achieved in the resulting stereo pair. If not, be sure the parallax shift is horizontal, that is, across a vertical axis (if necessary, use software functions to rotate the images to vertically orient the tilt axis). If the tilt axis is vertical but the stereo pair still shows the wrong sense of the topography, try reversing the images so the “high tilt” image is now viewed by the left eye and the “low tilt” image viewed by the right eye. Once the proper procedure has been discovered to give the correct sense of the topography on a known test structure, follow this convention for future stereomicroscopy work. (Note: A small but significant fraction of observers find it difficult to fuse the images to form a stereo image.)
106\ Chapter 6 · Image Formation
. Fig. 6.15 Anaglyph stereo presentation of SEM/E–T(positive) images (E0 = 20 keV) of a grain of Mt. St. Helens volcanic ash prepared by the stage tilting stereo method
|
Left image |
Right image |
|
|
(red filter) |
(cyan filter) |
|
6 |
|||
|
|
||
|
|
|
Mt. St. Helens ash
. Fig. 6.16 Anaglyph stereo presentation of SEM/E–T(positive) images (E0 = 20 keV) of a grain of gypsum crystals prepared by the stage tilting stereo method
Left image |
Right image |
(red filter) |
(cyan filter) |
Cement: gypsum crystals
Fixed Specimen, Beam Incidence Angle Changed
The beam incidence angle relative to the specimen can be changed by a small value by means of a deflection in the final stage of the scan to create the two distinct views needed to achieve the stereo effect. An example of a stereo pair created in this manner is shown in . Fig. 6.17 for a
fractured fragment of galena. By applying the two beam tilts to alternate image scans at high rate, “live” 3D SEM imaging can be achieved that is nearly “flicker free.” By eliminating the need for mechanical stage motion as well as avoiding problems which frequently occur due to shifting of the area of interest during mechanical tilting, the speed of the beam tilting method makes it very powerful for studying complex