- •Remote and chemical seals
- •Filled impulse lines
- •Purged impulse lines
- •Water traps and pigtail siphons
- •Mounting brackets
- •Heated enclosures
- •Process/instrument suitability
- •Review of fundamental principles
- •Continuous level measurement
- •Level gauges (sightglasses)
- •Basic concepts of sightglasses
- •Interface problems
- •Temperature problems
- •Float
- •Hydrostatic pressure
- •Bubbler systems
- •Transmitter suppression and elevation
- •Compensated leg systems
- •Tank expert systems
- •Hydrostatic interface level measurement
- •Displacement
- •Torque tubes
- •Displacement interface level measurement
- •Echo
- •Ultrasonic level measurement
- •Radar level measurement
- •Laser level measurement
- •Magnetostrictive level measurement
- •Weight
- •Capacitive
- •Radiation
- •Level sensor accessories
- •Review of fundamental principles
- •Continuous temperature measurement
- •Bi-metal temperature sensors
- •Filled-bulb temperature sensors
- •Thermistors and Resistance Temperature Detectors (RTDs)
- •Proper RTD sensor connections
- •Thermocouples
- •Dissimilar metal junctions
- •Thermocouple types
- •Connector and tip styles
- •Manually interpreting thermocouple voltages
- •Reference junction compensation
- •Law of Intermediate Metals
- •Software compensation
- •Extension wire
- •Burnout detection
- •Non-contact temperature sensors
- •Concentrating pyrometers
- •Distance considerations
1466 |
CHAPTER 20. CONTINUOUS LEVEL MEASUREMENT |
20.4.3Displacement interface level measurement
Displacer level instruments may be used to measure liquid-liquid interfaces just the same as hydrostatic pressure instruments. One important requirement is that the displacer always be fully submerged (“flooded”). If this rule is violated, the instrument will not be able to discriminate between a low (total) liquid level and a low interface level. This criterion is analogous to the use of compensated-leg di erential pressure instruments to measure liquid-liquid interface levels: in order for the instrument to solely respond to changes in interface level and not be “fooled” by changes in total liquid level, both process connection points must be submerged.
If the displacer instrument has its own “cage,” it is important that both pipes connecting the cage to the process vessel (sometimes called “nozzles”) be submerged. This ensures the liquid interface inside the cage matches the interface inside the vessel. If the upper nozzle ever goes dry, the same problem can happen with a caged displacer instrument as with a “sightglass” level gauge (see section 20.1.2 beginning on page 1412 for a detailed explanation of this problem.).
Calculating buoyant force on a displacer element due to a combination of two liquids is not as di cult as it may sound. Archimedes’ Principle still holds: that buoyant force is equal to the weight of the fluid(s) displaced. All we need to do is calculate the combined weights and volumes of the displaced liquids to calculate buoyant force. For a single liquid, buoyant force is equal to the weight density of that liquid (γ) multiplied by the volume displaced (V ):
Fbuoyant = γV
For a two-liquid interface, the buoyant force is equal to the sum of the two liquid weights displaced, each liquid weight term being equal to the weight density of that liquid multiplied by the displaced volume of that liquid:
Fbuoyant = γ1V1 + γ2V2
20.4. DISPLACEMENT |
1467 |
Assuming a displacer of constant cross-sectional area throughout its length, the volume for each liquid’s displacement is simply equal to the same area (πr2) multiplied by the length of the displacer submerged in that liquid:
Vessel |
Light liquid |
|
Density = γ2 |
|
displacer |
|
Heavy liquid |
|
Density = γ1 |
l2
l1
Displacer area = πr2
Fbuoyant = γ1πr2l1 + γ2πr2l2
Since the area (πr2) is common to both buoyancy terms in this equation, we may factor it out for simplicity’s sake:
Fbuoyant = πr2(γ1l1 + γ2l2)
Determining the calibration points of a displacer-type level instrument for interface applications is relatively easy if the LRV and URV conditions are examined as a pair of “thought experiments” just as we did with hydrostatic interface level measurement. First, we imagine what the displacer’s condition would “look like” with the interface at the lower range value, then we imagine a di erent scenario with the interface at the upper range value. Sketching illustrations of each scenario is recommended for clarity.
Suppose we have a displacer instrument measuring the interface level between two liquids having specific gravities of 0.850 and 1.10, with a displacer length of 30 inches and a displacer diameter of 2.75 inches (radius = 1.375 inches). Let us further suppose the LRV in this case is where the interface is at the displacer’s bottom and the URV is where the interface is at the displacer’s top. The placement of the LRV and URV interface levels at the extreme ends of the displacer’s length simplifies our LRV and URV calculations, as the LRV “thought experiment” will simply be the displacer completely submerged in light liquid and the URV “thought experiment” will simply be the displacer completely submerged in heavy liquid.
1468 |
CHAPTER 20. CONTINUOUS LEVEL MEASUREMENT |
LRV interface level condition |
URV interface level condition |
Light liquid
SG = 0.85
Heavy liquid
SG = 1.10
|
γ2 |
URV |
|
|
displacer |
||
F = γ2V |
30 in |
||
|
γ1 |
LRV |
Light liquid |
|
γ2 |
|
|
SG = 0.85 |
|
URV |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
displacer |
||
Heavy liquid |
F = γ1V |
30 in |
||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
SG = 1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
γ1 |
LRV |
Calculating the LRV buoyant force:
Fbuoyant (LRV) = γ2V = γ2πr2l
Calculating the URV buoyant force:
|
Fbuoyant (URV) = γ1V = γ1πr2l |
||||||
Showing the actual calculations for this hypothetical example: |
|||||||
γ1 |
= 62.4 |
lb |
|
(1.10) = 68.6 |
lb |
= 0.0397 |
lb |
|
|
|
|||||
ft3 |
ft3 |
in3 |
|||||
γ2 |
= 62.4 |
lb |
|
(0.85) = 53.0 |
lb |
= 0.0307 |
lb |
|
|
|
|||||
ft3 |
ft3 |
in3 |
Fbuoyant (LRV) = 0.0307 lb π(1.375 in)2(30 in) = 5.47 lb in3
Fbuoyant (URV) = 0.0397 lb π(1.375 in)2(30 in) = 7.08 lb in3
20.4. DISPLACEMENT |
1469 |
The buoyancy for any measurement percentage between the LRV (0%) and URV (100%) may be calculated by interpolation:
Interface level (inches) |
Buoyant force (pounds) |
0 |
5.47 |
|
|
7.5 |
5.87 |
|
|
15 |
6.27 |
|
|
22.5 |
6.68 |
|
|
30 |
7.08 |