Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Jones D.M.The new C standard (C90 and C++).An economic and cultural commentary.2005

.pdf
Скачиваний:
19
Добавлен:
23.08.2013
Размер:
1.36 Mб
Скачать

1211 6.5.9 Equality operators

relational 1190 operators

pointer operands

equality operators pointer to incomplete type

C++

The discussion on the relational operators is applicable here.

— one operand is a pointer to an object or incomplete type and the other is a pointer to a qualified or 1206 unqualified version of void; or

C++

This special case is not called out in the C++ Standard.

1#include <stdlib.h>

2

3struct node {

4int mem;

5

};

6void *glob;

7

8void f(void)

9{

10/* The following is conforming */

11// The following is ill-formed

12struct node *p = malloc(sizeof(struct node));

13

14/*

15* There are no C/C++ differences when the object being assigned

16* has a pointer to void type, 4.10p2.

17*/

18glob = p;

19}

relational

operators See relational operators for additional issues.

constraints

Semantics

equality operators

Each of the operators yields 1 if the specified relation is true and 0 if it is false.

1209

true or false

C++

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.10p1

 

 

 

 

 

 

The == (equal to) and the != (not equal to) operators have the same . . . truth-value result as the relational

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

operators.

 

 

 

equality 1210

 

 

 

 

 

This difference is only visible to the developer in one case. In all other situations the behavior is the same—

operators

result type

false and true will be converted to 0 and 1 as needed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

equality operators

The result has type int.

1210

result type

C++

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.10p1

 

 

 

 

 

 

The == (equal to) and the != (not equal to) operators have the same . . . result type as the relational operators.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

relational

 

1201

The difference is also the same as relational operators.

 

 

 

operators

 

 

 

 

 

result type

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

equality operators

For any pair of operands, exactly one of the relations is true.

1211

exactly one rela-

 

 

 

 

 

tion is true

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

v 1.0b

September 2, 2005

6.5.9 Equality operators 1220

C90

This requirement was not explicitly specified in the C90 Standard. It was created, in part, by the response to DR #172.

C++

This requirement is not explicitly specified in the C ++ Standard.

1212 If both of the operands have arithmetic type, the usual arithmetic conversions are performed.

C90

Where the operands have types and values suitable for the relational operators, the semantics detailed in 6.3.8 apply.

1213 Values of complex types are equal if and only if both their real parts are equal and also their imaginary parts are equal.

C90

Support for complex types is new in C99.

1214 Any two values of arithmetic types from different type domains are equal if and only if the results of their conversions to the (complex) result type determined by the usual arithmetic conversions are equal.

C90

Support for different type domains, and complex types, is new in C99.

C++

The concept of type domain is new in C99 and is not specified in the C ++ Standard, which defines construc-

 

tors to handle this case. The conversions performed by these constructions have the same effect as those

696 real type

 

converted to

 

performed in C.

complex

 

 

 

 

 

1215 91) The expression a<b<c is not interpreted as in ordinary mathematics.

footnote

 

C++

91

 

 

 

The C++ Standard does not make this observation.

 

 

 

 

1219 Otherwise, at least one operand is a pointer.

 

 

C++

 

 

The C++ Standard does not break its discussion down into the nonpointer and pointer cases.

 

1220 If one operand is a pointer and the other is a null pointer constant, the null pointer constant is converted to equality operators

the type of the pointer.

null pointer con-

stant converted

 

C90

If a null pointer constant is assigned to or compared for equality to a pointer, the constant is converted to a pointer of that type.

In the case of the expression (void *)0 == 0 both operands are null pointer constants. The C90 wording 744 null pointer

constant

permits the left operand to be converted to the type of the right operand (type int). The C99 wording does not support this interpretation.

September 2, 2005

v 1.0b

1225 6.5.10 Bitwise AND operator

equality operators null pointer constant

equality operators pointer to void

C++

The C++ Standard supports this combination of operands but does not explicitly specify any sequence of operations that take place prior to the comparison.

If one operand is a pointer to an object or incomplete type and the other is a pointer to a qualified or unquali- 1221 fied version of void, the former is converted to the type of the latter.

C++

pointers compare equal

This conversion is part of the general pointer conversion (4.10) rules in C++. This conversion occurs when two operands have pointer type.

Two pointers compare equal if and only if both are null pointers, both are pointers to the same object (including 1223 a pointer to an object and a subobject at its beginning) or function, both are pointers to one past the last element of the same array object, or one is a pointer to one past the end of one array object and the other is

a pointer to the start of a different array object that happens to immediately follow the first array object in the address space.92)

C90

If two pointers to object or incomplete types are both null pointers, they compare equal. If two pointers to object or incomplete types compare equal, they both are null pointers, or both point to the same object, or both point one past the last element of the same array object. If two pointers to function types are both null pointers or both point to the same function, they compare equal. If two pointers to function types compare equal, either both are null pointers, or both point to the same function.

The admission that a pointer one past the end of an object and a pointer to the start of a different object compare equal, if the implementation places the latter immediately following the former in the address space, is new in C99 (but it does describe the behavior of most C90 implementations).

C++

5.10p1

Two pointers of the same type compare equal if and only if they are both null, both point to the same object or function, or both point one past the end of the same array.

This specification does not include the cases:

“(including a pointer to an object and a subobject at its beginning)”, which might be deduced from

object 757

wording given elsewhere,

lowest ad-

dressed byte

 

“or one is a pointer to one past the end of one array object and the other is a pointer to the start of a different array object that happens to immediately follow the first array object in the address space”. The C++ Standard does not prevent an implementation from returning a result of true for the second case, but it does not require it. However, the response to C++ DR #073 deals with the possibility of a pointer pointing one past the end of an object comparing equal, in some implementations, to the address of another object. Wording changes are proposed that acknowledge this possibility.

6.5.10Bitwise AND operator

Constraints

v 1.0b

September 2, 2005

 

 

6.5.13 Logical AND operator

1239

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1225 Each of the operands shall have integer type.

& binary

 

 

 

 

 

operand type

 

C++

 

 

The wording of the specification in the C ++ Standard is somewhat informal (the same wording is given for

 

 

the bitwise exclusive-OR operator, 5.12p1, and the bitwise inclusive-OR operator, 5.13p1).

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.11p1

 

 

 

The operator applies only to integral or enumeration operands.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Semantics

 

 

 

 

 

1226 The usual arithmetic conversions are performed on the operands.

& binary

 

C++

operands

 

converted

The following conversion is presumably performed on the operands.

The usual arithmetic conversions are performed;

5.11p1

 

 

 

1228 92) Two objects may be adjacent in memory because they are adjacent elements of a larger array or adjacent members of a structure with no padding between them, or because the implementation chose to place them so, even though they are unrelated.

C90

The C90 Standard did not discuss these object layout possibilities.

C++

The C++ Standard does not make these observations.

1229 If prior invalid pointer operations (such as accesses outside array bounds) produced undefined behavior, subsequent comparisons also produce undefined behavior.

footnote 92

C90

The C90 Standard did not discuss this particular case of undefined behavior.

6.5.11 Bitwise exclusive OR operator

Constraints

Semantics

6.5.12 Bitwise inclusive OR operator

Constraints

Semantics

6.5.13 Logical AND operator

Constraints

1239 Each of the operands shall have scalar type.

&&

C++

operand type

 

 

5.14p1

September 2, 2005

v 1.0b

1248 6.5.14 Logical OR operator

The operands are both implicitly converted to type bool (clause 4).

Boolean conversions (4.12) covers conversions for all of the scalar types and is equivalent to the C behavior.

Semantics

&&

The && operator shall yield 1 if both of its operands compare unequal to 0;

1240

operand com-

 

 

pare against 0

5.14p1

&&

result type

5.14p2

&&

sequence point

5.14p2

C++

The result is true if both operands are true and false otherwise.

The difference in operand types is not applicable because C++ defines equality to return

true or false. The

difference in return value will not cause different behavior because false and true will be converted to 0

and 1 when required.

 

 

 

 

 

The result has type int.

1242

C++

 

 

The result is a bool.

The difference in result type will result in a difference of behavior if the result is the immediate operand of the sizeof operator. Such usage is rare.

there is a sequence point after the evaluation of the first operand.

1244

C++

 

All side effects of the first expression except for destruction of temporaries (12.2) happen before the second expression is evaluated.

function call

1017

The possible difference in behavior is the same as for the function-call operator.

 

sequence point

 

 

 

6.5.14 Logical OR operator

 

 

Constraints

 

 

 

 

1247

 

 

Each of the operands shall have scalar type.

 

 

C++

 

5.15p1

The operands are both implicitly converted to bool (clause 4).

Boolean conversions (4.12) covers conversions for all of the scalar types and is equivalent to the C behavior.

Semantics

v 1.0b

September 2, 2005

6.5.15 Conditional operator 1255

1248 The || operator shall yield 1 if either of its operands compare unequal to 0;

C++

It returns true if either of its operands is true, and false otherwise.

The difference in operand types is not applicable because C++ defines equality to return true or false. The difference in return value will not cause different behavior because false and true will be converted to 0 and 1 when required.

1250 The result has type int.

C++

The result is a bool.

The difference in result type will result in a difference of behavior if the result is the immediate operand of the sizeof operator. Such usage is rare.

1252 there is a sequence point after the evaluation of the first operand.

C++

All side effects of the first expression except for destruction of temporaries (12.2) happen before the second expression is evaluated.

The differences are discussed elsewhere.

||

operand compared against 0

5.15p1

||

result type

5.15p2

operator || sequence point

5.15p2

1244 &&

sequence point

6.5.15 Conditional operator

1254

conditional-expression: logical-OR-expression

logical-OR-expression ? expression : conditional-expression

C++

conditional-expression: logical-or-expression logical-or-expression ? expression : assignment-expression

Supporting an assignment-expression as the third operand enables the use of a throw-expression; for instance:

conditionalexpression

syntax

5.16

1278 assignmentexpression syntax

1 z = can_I_deal_with_this() ? 42 : throw X;

Source developed using a C++ translator may contain uses of the conditional operator that are a constraint violation if processed by a C translator. For instance, the expression x?a:b=c will need to be rewritten as x?a:(b=c).

Constraints

September 2, 2005

v 1.0b

1268 6.5.15 Conditional operator

The first operand shall have scalar type.

1255

C++

 

5.16p1

The first expression is implicitly converted to bool (clause 4).

Boolean conversions (4.12) covers conversions for all of the scalar types and is equivalent to the C behavior.

conditional

— both operands are pointers to qualified or unqualified versions of compatible types;

1260

expression

 

 

pointer to compatible types

5.16p6

subtraction 1149 pointer operands

C++

— The second and third operands have pointer type, or one has pointer type and the other is a null pointer constant; pointer conversions (4.10) and qualification conversions (4.4) are performed to bring them to their composite pointer type (5.9).

These conversions will not convert a pointer to an enumerated type to a pointer to integer type.

If one pointed-to type is an enumerated type and the other pointed-to type is the compatible integer type. C permits such operands to occur in the same conditional-expression. C++ does not. See pointer subtraction for an example.

— one operand is a pointer to an object or incomplete type and the other is a pointer to a qualified or 1262 unqualified version of void.

C++

The C++ Standard does not support implicit conversions from pointer to void to pointers to other types (4.10p2). Therefore, this combination of operand types is not permitted.

1 int glob;

2 char *pc;

3void *pv;

4

5void f(void)

6{

7glob ? pc : pv; /* does not affect the conformance status of the program */

8

// ill-formed

9}

Semantics

conditional

there is a sequence point after its evaluation.

1264

operator

 

 

 

sequence point

C++

 

5.16p1

 

 

 

 

All side effects of the first expression except for destruction of temporaries (12.2) happen before the second or

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

third expression is evaluated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

function call

1017

The possible difference in behavior is the same as for the function-call operator.

 

sequence point

 

 

v 1.0b

September 2, 2005

6.5.15 Conditional operator 1276

1268 If an attempt is made to modify the result of a conditional operator or to access it after the next sequence point, the behavior is undefined.

C90

Wording to explicitly specify this undefined behavior is new in the C99 Standard.

conditional operator

attempt to modify

C++

 

The C++ definition of lvalue is the same as C90, so this wording is not necessary in C ++.

717 lvalue

1273 Furthermore, if both operands are pointers to compatible types or to differently qualified versions of compatible types, the result type is a pointer to an appropriately qualified version of the composite type;

C90

Furthermore, if both operands are pointers to compatible types or differently qualified versions of a compatible type, the result has the composite type;

The C90 wording did not specify that the appropriate qualifiers were added after forming the composite type. In:

1extern int glob;

2 const enum {E1, E2} *p_ce;

3volatile int *p_vi;

4

5void f(void)

6{

7 glob = *((p_e != p_i) ? p_vi : p_ce);

8}

the pointed-to type, which is the composite type of the enum and int types, is also qualified with const and volatile.

1275 otherwise, one operand is a pointer to void or a qualified version of void, in which case the result type is a pointer to an appropriately qualified version of void.

C90

otherwise, one operand is a pointer to void or a qualified version of void, in which case the other operand is converted to type pointer to void, and the result has that type.

C90 did not add any qualifies to the pointer to void type. In the case of the const qualifier this difference would not have been noticable (the resulting pointer type could not have been dereferenced without an explicit cast to modify the pointed-to object). In the case of the volatile qualifier this difference may result in values being accessed from registers in C90 while they will be accessed from storage in C99.

C++

The C++ Standard explicitly specifies the behavior for creating a composite pointer type (5.9p2) which is returned in this case.

1276 93) A conditional expression does not yield an lvalue.

footnote

 

93

September 2, 2005

v 1.0b

1278 6.5.16 Assignment operators

 

 

C++

5.16p4

 

 

 

If the second and third operands are lvalues and have the same type, the result is of that type and is an lvalue.

 

5.16p5

 

 

 

 

 

 

Otherwise, the result is an rvalue.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source developed using a C++ translator may contain instances where the result of the conditional operator

 

 

 

 

appears in an rvalue context, which will cause a constraint violation if processed by a C translator.

 

 

 

 

 

EXAMPLE ?: common pointer type

1extern int glob;

2

3void f(void)

4{

5

short loc_s;

6

int loc_i;

7

 

8

((glob < 2) ? loc_i : glob) = 3; /* constraint violation */

9

// conforming

10((glob > 2) ? loc_i : loc_s) = 3; // ill-formed

11}

EXAMPLE The common type that results when the second and third operands are pointers is determined in 1277 two independent stages. The appropriate qualifiers, for example, do not depend on whether the two pointers

have compatible types. Given the declarations

const void *c_vp; void *vp;

const int *c_ip; volatile int *v_ip; int *ip;

const char *c_cp;

the third column in the following table is the common type that is the result of a conditional expression in which the first two columns are the second and third operands (in either order):

c_vp

c_ip

const void *

v_ip

0

volatile int *

c_ip

v_ip

const volatile int *

vp

c_cp

const void *

ip

c_ip

const int *

vp

ip

void *

assignmentexpression syntax

C90

This example is new in C99.

6.5.16 Assignment operators

1278

assignment-expression: conditional-expression

unary-expression assignment-operator assignment-expression assignment-operator: one of

= *= /= %= += -= <<= >>= &= ^= |=

v 1.0b

September 2, 2005

6.5.16 Assignment operators 1285

C++

assignment-expression: conditional-expression logical-or-expression assignment-operator assignment-expression throw-expression

For some types, a cast is an lvalue in C++.

Constraints

1279 An assignment operator shall have a modifiable lvalue as its left operand.

C90

The C99 Standard has removed the requirement, that was in C90, which lvalues refer to objects. This has resulted in the conformance status of the assignment 1=3 changing from a constraint violation to undefined behavior. The lvalue 1 does not designate an object and is not const-qualified. Therefore it is not ruled out from being modifiable in C99.

Semantics

1281 An assignment expression has the value of the left operand after the assignment, but is not an lvalue.

C++

. . . ; the result is an lvalue.

The C++ DR #222 (which at the time of this writing is at the drafting stage) queries some of the consequences of the result being an lvalue.

Source developed using a C++ translator may contain assignments that are a constraint violation if processed by a C translator.

1extern int glob;

2

3void f(void)

4{

5int x;

6volatile int y;

7

8(glob += 5) += 6; /* constraint violation */

9

// current status undefined behavior, object modified

10

// twice between sequence points. The response to DR #222

11

// may add a sequence point, making the behavior defined

12

 

13x = y = 0; /* equivalent to y=0; x=0; */

14// equivalent to y=0; x=y;

15}

1283 The side effect of updating the stored value of the left operand shall occur between the previous and the next sequence point.

C++

5.17

1121 footnote

85

assignment operator modifiable lvalue

717 lvalue

717 lvalue

assignment value of

5.17p1

assignment

when side effect occurs

The C++ Standard does not explicitly state this requirement.

1284 The order of evaluation of the operands is unspecified.

assignment

 

operand eval-

 

uation order

September 2, 2005

v 1.0b

Соседние файлы в предмете Электротехника