Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.04.2024
Размер:
233.42 Кб
Скачать

DIELECTRIC FILTERS FOR SHORT MILLIMETRE WAVE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS

G.B.Morgan

TH3.5

University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology,

Cardiff, Wales

Abstract

Characteristics are presented for narrow.band pass (~3%) filters designed with temperature compensated high permittivity dielectrics (barium nonatitanate). AtW band both duroid and Z cut quartz microstrip substrates have been investigated and the insertkn losses due to the various coupling fields are estimated to be ~ 2dB for 2 resonator filters and ~ 3.5 dB for 3 resonator filters.

Introduction

The concept of temperature compensating dielectric resonant devices is independent of frequency and this paper shows that millimetre wave systems requiring filters could possibly benefit from using high permittivity, temperature compensated dielectric resonators in low order modes, since they are inexpensive, small and

compatible with most of

the circuit

technologies1

At the short millimetre

wavelengths

machined

circuits are expensive so that printed

circuits

would seem to offer the

best solutions

for most

system requirements. Open microstrip circuits have been used at 600 GHz and are very attractive from the fabrication and cost point of view, so that data are presented for W band dielectric band

pass filters on microstrip with particular

atten-

tion being given to the

insertion

loss of the filter.

The high

permittivity

dielectric

was barium nona-

titanate

provided by Plessey,

which at

5.75

GHz

had

a permittivity of 39,

a tan

8 of < 2x

10-4

and

a

temperature coefficient of resonant frequency of 6 ppm;oC.

Microstrip Substrates and Dielectric Spacers

for W Band

AtW band the main microstrip substrates are 5880 duroid, water free fuzed quartz and Z cut crystal quartz which have respective permittivities

of

2.2, 3.8

and 4.4, with corresponding values of

tan

8 of ~

0.9 mrad, 80 ~rad

and

50. ~rad.

The

lowest measured values of total

loss figures 2 for

50

n lines

are respectively

0.07, 0.045

and ~

0.055 dB/mm, but, when only the dielectric filter is considered it is necessary to know the individual values of the conduction loss and the dielectric loss. The ease of circuit fabrication and the effects of temperatures must also be considered, as well as the technique for determining the insertion loss of the filter. Previous experience has shown that the determination of the errors in the value of the filter loss must take into account variations in microstrip losses, microstrip to waveguide transformer loss, and 'bolting up' losses. These last three losses are eliminated in the present work by fabricating the filter in situ.

In comparing substrates, the maximum thickness

of substrate for

a given impedance and

frequency

should, strictly speaking, be taken as

the basis

for comparison.

But

as will be seen

from the

values of the losses given in Table 1,

this was

not really necessary

in the present case, so that

the

comparison is at 100 GHz for 50 n lines

with

125

~ thick substrates propagating the quasi

TEM

mode. In the calculation of the conductor loss a correction must bemade for surface roughness and the skin depth of the conductor. The quartz circuits use gold metallizations which are 5 ~ thick and which for good adhesion require a surface finish of ~ 0 .15 ~ CLA and a chrome keying layer of

~0.04~. It is estimated that the finish of the

copper clad 5880 duroid is about 0.75 ~ CLA. Assuming the classical skin depths of chromium, gold and copper, which are respectively 0.26, 0.24

and 0.21 ~, the loss data of Table 1 were calculated.

 

Material

 

Duroid

Fused

Z cut

 

 

 

 

QuartzQuartz

relative permittivity,

Er

2.2

3.8

4.4

tan 8 x 10- 4

 

9

0.8

0.5

Dielectric loss,

(dB/A)

.023

.002

.001

Smooth

conductor loss,

g

.082

.094

.104

 

Rough

 

 

.160

.124

.135

Total

rough ~ strip loss

.183

.126

.136

 

n

(dB/l'1Ill) .083

.074

.101

Table 1. Theoretical estimation of conductor and dielectric losses for 50 n microstrip at 100 GHz for various 125 ~ thick substrates.

It maybe seen that the filter should have a minimum amount of conductor in its design. Such designs are given in Figures 1 and 3, where both microstrip and dielectric losses are minimised.

 

 

Two Resonator Filters

A plan of atwo resonator filter is given in

Figure lA. There is RF coupling from the 50 n

microstrip

input line to resonator 1, from resonator

1 to resonator 2 and then from resonator 2 to the

o~tpu~

line. For measurement purposes themicrostrip

Clrcult was

transformed to waveguide WG27 (WR10) at

the input and output.

Rather than use a substitution method for in-

sertion loss, the loss was measured in situ, by

taking

a50

n line and removing a section of the

line,

without removing any part of the filter

assembly from the test bench. Thus, after measuring the loss of the 50 n line assembly the section AB

was

re~oved,

the resonators

were put

in position

(see

Flgure

lB)

and the new

insertion

loss

measured

thus

giving

the

contribution of the filter

section '

directly3. Two sets of cuboid resonators were used

in this studY;3 one

set had dimensions of

0.30 x

 

0.60

x

0.60 mm

and

had

an absorption Q of ~

660

at

82GHz,

whi.lst3the other had dimensions of

0.20 x

 

0.80

x

0.80 mm

and had

an absorption Q of ~

420

at

78GHz.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It was found that the smallness of the gap AB resulted in direct coupling (~-15 dB) between the

input and output microstrip. Figure 2 shows the

CH1917-4/83/0000- TH35 $0.75 C 1983 IEEE

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER. Downloaded on September 22,2020 at 04:42:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

response of a filter using the 0.8 mm resonators

which had

an insertion loss

of ~ 2dB at a centre

frequency

of ~ 78.2 GHz.The

-10 dB bandwidth was

3.1 GHz (the ripple was due to the sweep oscillator

system) and the signal

level in

the band stop was

~-15

dB below the value

at the

centre frequency. The

increase of band stop attenuation requires an increase in the distance AB,. and more resonators.

Three Resonator Filters

In the three resonator filter the question of s~pporting the central resonator must be considered,

s~nce, to cut down dielectric losses in the duroid it was decided to remove a section of the 50 n lin~,

and the underlying substrate and ground plane. The

resonators

were

thus

supported ona

bridge

of

Z cut

quartz

3 mm

long,

1 mm wide

and 40

~ thick*,

and a

section through the filter is given in Figure 3.

With an air gap of ~

1.8 mm, the insertion loss of

the

filter

was

~

3.5

dB and the centre frequency

was

~

81.5 GHz

with a

-10 dB bandwidth of ~

2.6 GHz

The skirt levels are much lower than for the two

resonator design, being ~-35

dB on

the low

frequ-

ency

side,

see

Figure

4.

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

Whilst the performance of these narrow band filters is not as good as metal E plane waveguide filters· they are small and directly compatible with millimetre wave integrated circuits both in technology and size. It would seem that they are comparable to coplanar filters 5

*As the resonator is raised above the microstrip line the coupling will change. In this filter the

 

 

,

 

 

 

 

 

~ .

 

 

 

 

 

~ ".,

I

 

 

 

 

 

F~g.

 

lA.

Plan of 2 Iresonator filters

.~ / .

,1 &l :.

duroid '

.us

t.rLp

a~r

 

 

 

 

 

 

T113.5

0.6 mm square resonators were used and the effect of spacer height on the absorption frequency and Q of the TEll mode is given below.

Resonator

height, ~m

0

40

80

125

Resonant

frequency, GHz

82.0

81.1

79.2

78.8

Q of absorption dip

660

540

500

440

Acknowledgement

I wish to thank Plessey, Caswell, for the resonators and the use of their facilities.

References

1. MORGAN, 'Temperature compensated high permittivity dielectric resonators for millimetre wave systems', Int. J. of IR and MM Waves,~,Jan

1984.

2.SEASHORE and SINGH, 'mm wave component trade-

offs for tactical systems, M.J., 25,

41-62, June 82.

3. MORGAN and DAVIDSON, 'Low ins~tion

loss, temp-

erature compensated dielectric filters for microwave

integrated circuits',

Electron. Lett.19, 545-546,1983.

4. BORNEMANN, et al,

'Optimised low-insertion-loss

millimetre-wave fin line and metal insert filters'. Radio and Electronic Eng., 52,513-521, 1982.

5.

WILLIAMS and SCHWARZ,

'Design and

performance

of coplanar waveguide bandpass filters', MTT-31,

558-566,

1983.

 

---

 

 

Quartz spacer

 

50 Q

Re

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~strip

 

 

air

duroid

\\\\\\\\

 

\~p~e~b~se

\\\\\\\

'\ " \'

Fig.

3.X

Section of 3 resonator filter

 

 

NOT TO SCALE

 

 

Fig. 4 Response of 3 resonator filter.~ertical

scale 5 dB!cm(div»)

I I I I I

Fig. 2 Response of 2 resonator filter

CH1917-4/83/0000-TH35 $0.75 C 1983 IEEE

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER. Downloaded on September 22,2020 at 04:42:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.