Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Biology_of_Turtles

.pdf
Скачиваний:
88
Добавлен:
11.02.2015
Размер:
44.64 Mб
Скачать

156

Table 6.2

Values (mean ± SD) of Kinematic Variables Measured from the Hindlimbs of Juvenile Slider (T. scripta) and Spiny Softshell (A. spinifera)

Turtles during Aquatic (Water) and Terrestrial (Land) Locomotion

 

T. scripta

 

A. spinifera

 

 

 

 

Variable

Water

Land

Water

Land

P1

P2

P3

P4

Maximum femur protraction

43.1° ± 6.1°

47.7° ± 4.9°

34.7° ± 4.5°

50.2° ± 8.5°

0.221

0.005*

0.047*

0.597

Maximum femur retraction

–29.0° ± 9.1°

–43.6° ± 6.4°

–60.0° ± 3.9°

–41.6° ± 10.5°

0.014*

0.003*

0.009*

0.880

Maximum femur elevation

–2.9° ± 1.6°

–4.7° ± 5.0°

–13.3° ± 2.8°

–6.0° ± 2.2°

0.270

0.002*

0.009*

0.496

Maximum femur depression

–17.2° ± 1.3°

–27.2° ± 2.5°

–26.4° ± 6.6°

–20.4° ± 6.9°

0.002*

0.086

0.009*

0.016*

Minimum knee flexion

92.2° ± 5.6°

93.4° ± 14.2°

88.0° ± 5.6°

74.1° ± 10.9°

0.327

0.270

0.076

0.005*

Maximum knee extension

142.5° ± 8.9°

136.7° ± 10.6°

132.7° ± 5.0°

125.0° ± 12.2°

0.903

0.037*

0.175

0.041*

The P values reported are for Mann-Whitney U-tests of the following comparisons in each row: P1 = T. scripta, water vs. land; P2 = A. spinifera, water vs. land; P3 = water, T. scripta vs. A. spinifera; P4 = land, T. scripta vs. A. spinifera.

*Significant at P < 0.05.

Turtles of Biology

Hindlimb Function in Turtle Locomotion

157

Trachemys

Apalone

A

B

Knee (deg)Angle

120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

140

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Extend

Flex

Percentage of Locomotor Cycle

Figure 6.12  Comparison of mean kinematic profiles for knee flexion and extension during walking in juvenile (A) Trachemys scripta and (B) Apalone spinifera. Ventral view still images from high-speed video recordings accompany each plot; black lines highlight the knee joint. Format for kinematic plots follows that in Figure 6.3. Error bars indicate 1 SE. Scale = 1 cm.

6.3.3Conclusions from Comparisons of Hindlimb

Function in Juvenile Slider and Softshell Turtles

Although the complex array of differences and similarities in hindlimb function between juvenile and adult T. scripta and A. spinifera makes interpretation challenging, some general conclusions can be drawn. First, interspecific differences in adult limb function are often not evident in juveniles of those species. Thus, even if functional tradeoffs related to specialization for particular habitats are evident across adults of different species, some of those tradeoffs might only appear later in the lives of those animals. Second, juveniles may show some kinematic and motor similarities to each other, potentially related to having small body sizes (Carrier, 1996), but they also can show spe- cies-specific functional specializations that are not seen in adults. Evaluating potential functional implications for such differences could provide substantial insight into the survival of animals at a crucial stage of life history.

6.4Future Directions for Studies of Turtle Locomotion

The studies we have presented indicate how research on turtle locomotion and hindlimb function can contribute not only to our understanding of the functional morphology, behavior, and ecology of species in the turtle lineage, but also more broadly to studies in areas ranging from neuromotor control to functional development. Research on turtle locomotion is therefore critical for understanding how the diverse species of these distinctive animals survive in a variety of habitats. Moreover,

158

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biology of Turtles

 

 

Trachemys

 

 

 

 

Apalone

 

 

 

 

W S

 

 

 

 

 

W

S

 

 

A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Femtib

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flex Tib

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adult

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PIFI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

W S

 

 

 

 

 

W

S

 

 

B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Femtib

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flex Tib

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Juvenile

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PIFI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

 

 

 

 

Percentage of Cycle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Swim

 

Walk

 

 

 

Figure 6.13  Comparison of representative mean activity patterns for three focal hindlimb muscles during swimming (shaded bars) and walking (unshaded bars) for Trachemys scripta (left column) and Apalone spinifera (right column) for (A, replotted from Figure 6.9) adults and (B) juveniles. Vertical lines demarcate cycles into recovery (R) and thrust (T) phases for swimming and swing (SW) and stance (ST) phases for walking; these demarcations are both indicated with appropriate labels on muscle activity graphs. All error bars indicate 1 SE.

studies of turtle locomotion can provide a model for workers on other animal systems who are seeking to understand general principles of how the musculoskeletal system works and how its function can diversify through the course of evolution.

Several future directions for research on turtle locomotion are suggested by our results. First, measurement of EMG patterns from additional muscles could test for distinctions in the roles of muscles that appear—based on anatomical position—to have redundant functions across particular joints. Such studies could evaluate potential correlations of muscle motor patterns with distinctions in, for example, muscle fiber types (Laidlaw et al., 1995) or moment arms (Kargo & Rome, 2002), providing further insight into the versatility of motor control in turtle limbs despite the potential constraints placed on locomotion by the shell. Second, some proposed functions of muscles could be examined through direct measurement of muscle length change using sonomicrometry (Olson & Marsh, 1998; Gillis & Biewener, 2000). Among other questions, such measurements could address the potential for limb muscles to be operating at suboptimal lengths during terrestrial locomotion in aquatic specialist species. A third area warranting study is the production of propulsive forces during both terrestrial and aquatic environments. Although force platform studies have provided insight into the maintenance of slow speeds and the locomotor energetics of turtles (Jayes & Alexander, 1980; Zani et al., 2005), the implications of external locomotor forces for muscular force production and loading of the limb skeleton (Biewener, 1983; Blob & Biewener, 2001) remain to be examined. Efforts to measure the net force produced by all limbs during swimming have been made in turtles (Davenport et al., 1984), but measurements of forces produced by individual limbs—for

Hindlimb Function in Turtle Locomotion

159

example, using particle image velocimetry (Drucker & Lauder, 1999; Blob et al., 2003)—could inform evaluations of functional divergence between the fore and hindlimbs. A fourth potential area of focus for future research on turtle limb function is an expansion of the locomotor situations in which limb function is evaluated. Additional data on limb function in turtles under a variety of conditions, including variations in temperature, external load, and locomotor slope (Muegel & Claussen, 1994; Wren et al., 1998; Claussen et al., 2002, 2004), and in different behaviors, such as aquatic maneuvering (Rivera et al., 2006), could aid understanding of the full locomotor capacity of these animals and the impact it has on their survival (Biewener & Gillis, 1999; Reilly & Blob, 2003). Efforts to further examine forelimb function (Pace et al., 2001; Blob et al., 2004) and interlimb coordination (Renous & Bels, 1996; Blob et al., 2003) could also substantially improve understanding of turtle functional morphology, evolution, and ecology.

Examinations of any of these issues in single turtle species would be worthwhile, but because the turtle lineage includes species with a diverse range of habits and reasonably well resolved phylogenetic relationships, comparative studies of limb function in turtles hold especially high promise. Despite containing less than 300 species, turtles include species with diverse locomotor habits, including multiple evolutions of highly terrestrial groups (tortoises, box turtles), different types of highly aquatic groups (bilateral forelimb flapping sea turtles and carettochelyids, forelimb rowing trionychids, bottom walking kinosternids and chelydrids), and species (e.g., many emydids) with intermediate habits (Zug, 1971; Walker, 1973; Ernst & Barbour, 1989). The proliferation of recent research on evolutionary relationships of turtle species has provided an important framework for studies of this diversity (Shaffer et al., 1997; Van der Kuyl et al., 2002; Stephens & Wiens, 2003; Engstrom et al., 2004; Krenz et al., 2005). With data from a sufficiently broad ecological and phylogenetic range of species, it should be possible to evaluate primitive and derived character states for limb function in turtles, allowing tests of adaptive hypotheses through the application of phylogenetic comparative methods (Westneat, 1995; Butler & King, 2004; Garland et al., 2005). Thus, with continued expansion from efforts made to date, studies of turtle locomotion should provide an important model for future research on functional diversity, adaptation, and evolution.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the editors for their invitation to contribute to this volume, and to J. Wyneken and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an early version of this chapter. We also thank Cinnamon Pace and Erin Scanga for assistance with data collection for many of the experimental results reported in this chapter, Jeff Walker for access to QuickImage® and QuickSAND® software used for kinematic analysis, and Stephen Gosnell for pointing out helpful literature. Field collection of animals for this work was authorized by Illinois Scientific Permit No. A99.0550. This research was supported by NIH (1F32NS10813-01 and 5F32NS10813-02 to RWB) and the Office of Naval Research (N000149910184 to MWW and J. Walker). Support during final analyses and manuscript preparation was provided by NSF (IOB 0517340, to RWB), NIH (2 R01 DC005063-06A1 to E. Peterson, Ohio University; subaward UT10853 to RWB), and the Clemson Department of Biological Sciences.

References

Bennett, D.H., Gibbons, J.W., and Franson, J.C., Terrestrial activity in aquatic turtles, Ecology, 51, 738–740, 1970. Biewener, A.A., Locomotory stresses in the limb bones of two small mammals: The ground squirrel and

chipmunk, J. Exp. Biol., 103, 131–154,1983.

Biewener, A.A., and Gillis, G.B., Dynamics of muscle function during locomotion: Accommodating variable conditions, J. Exp. Biol., 202, 3387–3396, 1999.

160

Biology of Turtles

Blob, R.W., and Biewener, A.A., Mechanics of limb bone loading during terrestrial locomotion in the green iguana (Iguana iguana) and American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), J. Exp. Biol., 204, 1099– 1122, 2001.

Blob, R.W., Willey, J.S., and Lauder, G.V., Swimming in painted turtles: Particle image velocimetry reveals different propulsive roles for the forelimb and hindlimb, Integr. Comp. Biol., 43, 985, 2003.

Blob, R.W., Willey, J.S., and Wyneken, J., Limb muscle activation patterns during locomotion in loggerhead sea turtles, J. Morphol., 260, 279, 2004.

Bodie, J.R., and Semlitsch, R.D., Spatial and temporal use of floodplain habitats by lentic and lotic species of aquatic turtles, Oecologia, 122, 138–146, 2000.

Buchanan, T.S., Almdale, D.P.J., Lewis, J.L., and Rymer, W.Z., Characteristics of synergic relations during isometric contractions of human elbow muscles, J. Neurophysiol., 56, 1225–1241, 1986.

Buford, J.A., and Smith, J.L., Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking II. Hindlimb muscle synergies, J. Neurophysiol., 64, 756–766, 1990.

Burke, A.C., Development of the turtle carapace: Implications for the evolution of a novel bauplan, J. Morphol., 199, 363–378, 1989.

Butler, M., and King, A., Phylogenetic comparative analysis: A modeling approach for adaptive evolution, Am. Nat., 164, 683–695, 2004.

Cagle, F.R., Home range, homing behavior, and migration in turtles, Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich., 61, 1-34, 1944.

Cagle, F.R., Life history of the slider turtle, Pseudemys scripta troosti (Holbrook), Ecol. Monogr., 20, 33– 54, 1950.

Carrier, D.R., Ontogenetic limits on locomotor performance, Physiol. Zool., 69, 467–488, 1996.

Cazalets, J.R., Menard, I., Crémieux, J., and Clarac, F., Variability as a characteristic of immature motor systems: An electromyographic study of swimming in the newborn rat, Behav. Brain Res., 40, 215–225, 1990.

Claussen, D.L., Lim, R., Kurz, M., and Wren, K., Effects of slope, substrate, and temperature on the locomotion of the ornate box turtle, Terrapene ornata, Copeia, 2002, 411–418, 2002.

Claussen, D.L., Snashall, J., and Barden, C., Effects of slope, substrate and temperature on forces associated with locomotion of the ornate box turtle, Terrapene ornata, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 138, 269–276, 2004.

Dalrymple, G.H., Intraspecific variation in the cranial feeding mechanism of turtles of the genus Trionyx (Reptilia, Testudines, Trionychidae), J. Herpetol., 11, 255–285, 1977.

Davenport, J.S., Munks, A., and Oxford, P.J., A comparison of the swimming of marine and freshwater turtles, Proc. R.S. Lond. B, 220, 447–475, 1984.

Denny, M.W., Air and Water, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.

Drucker, E.G., and Lauder, G.V., Locomotor forces on a swimming fish: Three-dimensional vortex wake dynamics quantified using digital particle image velocimetry, J. Exp. Biol., 202, 2393–2412, 1999.

Earhart, G.M., and Stein, P.S.G., Step, swim, and scratch motor patterns in the turtle, J. Neurophysiol., 84, 2181–2190, 2000.

Engstrom, T.N., Shaffer, H.B., and McCord, W.P., Multiple data sets, high homoplasy, and the phylogeny of softshell turtles (Testudines: Trionychidae), Syst. Biol., 53, 693–710, 2004.

Ernst, C.H., and Barbour, R.W., Turtles of the World, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1989. Ernst, C.H., Lovich, J.E., and Barbour, R.W., Turtles of the United States and Canada, Washington, DC:

Smithsonian Institution Press, 1994.

Fish, F., Kinematics of undulatory swimming in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Copeia, 1984, 839–843, 1984.

Garland, T. Jr., Bennett, A.F., and Rezende, E.L., Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology, J. Exp. Biol., 208, 3015–3035, 2005.

Gatesy, S.M., Caudofemoral musculature and the evolution of theropod locomotion, Paleobiology, 16, 170– 186, 1990.

Gatesy, S.M., An electromyographic analysis of hindlimb function in Alligator during terrestrial locomotion, J. Morph., 234, 197–212, 1997.

Gibbons, J.W., Terrestrial activity and the population dynamics of aquatic turtles, Am. Midl. Nat., 83, 404– 414, 1970.

Gibbons, J.W., Life History and Ecology of the Slider Turtle, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1990.

Gilchrist, G.W., Specialists and generalists in changing environments. I. Fitness landscapes of thermal sensitivity, Am. Nat., 146, 252–270, 1995.

Hindlimb Function in Turtle Locomotion

161

Gillis, G.B., and Biewener, A.A., Hindlimb extensor muscle function during jumping and swimming in the toad (Bufo marinus), J. Exp. Biol., 203, 3547–3563, 2000.

Gillis, G.B., and Blob, R.W., How muscles accommodate movement in different physical environments: Aquatic vs. terrestrial locomotion in vertebrates, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 131, 61–75, 2001.

Gruner, J.A., and Altman, J., Swimming in the rat: analysis of locomotor performance in comparison to stepping, Exp. Brain Res., 40, 374–382, 1980.

Hart, D.B., Dietary and habitat shift with size of red-eared turtles (Pseudemys scripta) in a southern Louisiana population, Herpetologica, 39, 285–290, 1983.

Heglund, N.C., and Taylor, C.R., Speed, stride frequency, and energy cost per stride. How do they change with body size and gait?, J. Exp. Biol., 138, 301–318, 1988.

Jackson, D.C., Living without oxygen: Lessons from the freshwater turtle, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 125, 299–315, 2000.

Jackson, D.C., Hibernating without oxygen: The painted turtle, J. Physiol. Lond., 543, 731–737, 2002. Jackson, D.C., Surviving extreme lactic acidosis: The role of calcium lactate formation in the anoxic turtle,

Resp. Physiol. Neurobiol., 144, 173–178, 2004.

Jayes, A.S., and Alexander, R.M., The gaits of chelonians: Walking techniques for very slow speeds, J. Zool., 191, 353–378, 1980.

Johnston, R.M., and Bekoff, A., Patterns of muscle activity during different behaviors in chicks: Implications for neural control, J. Comp. Physiol. A., 179, 169–184, 1996.

Kamel, L.T., Peters, S.E., and Bashor, D.P., Hopping and swimming in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens: II. A comparison of muscle activities, J. Morph., 230, 17–31, 1996.

Kargo, W.J., and Rome, L.C., Functional morphology of proximal hindlimb muscles in the frog Rana pipiens, J. Exp. Biol., 205, 1987–2004, 2002.

Krenz, J.G., Naylor, G.J.P., Shaffer, H.B., and Janzen, F.J., Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of turtles,

Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 37, 178–191, 2005.

Laidlaw, D.H., Callister, R.J., and Stuart, D.G., Fiber-type composition of hind limb muscles in the turtle,

Pseudemys (Trachemys) scripta elegans, J. Morphol., 225, 193–211, 1995.

Lauder, G.V., Function of the caudal fin during locomotion in fishes: Kinematics, flow visualization, and evolutionary patterns, Am. Zool., 40, 101–122, 2000.

Loeb, G.E., and Gans, C., Electromyography for Experimentalists, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986. Macpherson, J.M., How flexible are muscle synergies?, in Motor Control: Concepts and Issues, D.R. Hum-

phrey and H.J. Freund (eds.), Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1991, 33–47.

Miller, K., Packard, G.C., and Packard, M.J., Hydric conditions during incubation influence locomotor performance of hatchling snapping turtles, J. Exp. Biol., 127, 401–412, 1987.

Muegel, L.A., and Claussen, D.L., Effects of slope on voluntary locomotor performance in the turtle, Terrapene carolina carolina, J. Herpetol., 28, 1994.

Olson, J.M., and Marsh, R.L., Activation patterns and length changes in hindlimb muscles of the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana during jumping, J. Exp. Biol., 201, 2763–2777, 1998.

Pace, C.M., Blob, R.W., and Westneat, M.W., Comparative kinematics of the forelimb during swimming in red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta) and spiny softshell (Apalone spinifera) turtles, J. Exp. Biol., 204, 3261–3271, 2001.

Plummer, M.V., Mills, N.E., and Allen, S.L., Activity, habitat and movement patterns of softshell turtles (Trionyx spiniferus) in a small stream, Chel. Cons. Biol., 2, 514–520, 1997.

Pratt, C.A., Buford, J.A., and Smith, J.L., Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking: V. Mutable activation of bifunctional thigh muscles, J. Neurophysiol., 75, 832–842, 1996.

Reilly, S.M., and Blob, R.W., Motor control of locomotor hindlimb posture in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), J. Exp. Biol., 206, 4341–4351, 2003.

Renous, S., and Bels, V., Comparison between aquatic and terrestrial locomotions of the leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea), J. Zool. Lond., 230, 357–378, 1993.

Renous, S., and Bels, V.L., Swimming behaviour during first immersion in hatchling leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea), Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. Paris, 17, 25–38, 1996.

Rivera, G., Rivera, A.R.V., Dougherty, E.E., and Blob, R.W., Aquatic turning performance of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) and functional consequences of a rigid body design, J. Exp. Biol., 209, 4203–4213, 2006.

Roy, R.R., Hirota, W.K., Kuehl, M., and Edgerton, V.R., Recruitment patterns in the rat hindlimb muscle during swimming, Brain Res., 337, 175–178, 1985.

162

Biology of Turtles

Roy, R.R., Hutchinson, D.L., Pierotti, D.J., Hodgson, J.A., and Edgerton, V.R., EMG patterns of rat ankle extensors and flexors during treadmill locomotion and swimming, J. Appl. Physiol., 70, 2522–2529, 1991.

Schmidt-Nielsen, K., Animal Physiology: Adaptation and Environment, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Shaffer, H.B., Meylan, P., and McKnight, M.L., Tests of turtle phylogeny: Molecular, morphological, and paleontological approaches, Sys. Bio., 46, 235–268, 1997.

Snyder, R.C., Adaptations for bipedal and quadrupedal locomotion in lizards, Am. Zool., 2, 191–203, 1962. Stein, P.S.G., Neuronal control of turtle hindlimb motor rhythms, J. Comp. Physiol. A, 191, 213–229, 2003. Stephens, P.R., and Wiens, J.J., Ecological diversification and phylogeny of emydid turtles, Biol. J. Linn. Soc.,

79, 577–610, 2003.

Ultsch, G.R., The ecology of overwintering among turtles: Where turtles overwinter and its consequences, Biol. Rev., 81, 339–367, 2006.

Van der Kuyl, A.C., Ballasina, D.L.P., Dekker, J.T., Maas, J., Willemsen, R.E., and Goudsmit, J., Phylogenetic relationships among the species of the genus Testudo (Testudines: Testudinidae) inferred from mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene sequences, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 22, 174–183, 2002.

Vogel, S., Life in Moving Fluids, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.

Walker, J.A., Estimating velocities and accelerations of animal locomotion: A simulation experiment comparing numerically different algorithms, J. Exp. Biol., 201, 981–995, 1998.

Walker, J.A., and Westneat, M.W., Mechanical performance of aquatic rowing and flying, Proc. R.S. Lond. B, 267, 1875–1881, 2000.

Walker, W.F. Jr., A structural and functional analysis of walking in the turtle, Chrysemys picta marginata, J. Morphol., 134, 195–214, 1971.

Walker, W.F. Jr., The locomotor apparatus of Testudines, in Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 4: Morphology D, C. Gans and T.S. Parsons (eds.), London: Academic Press, 1973, 1–100.

Webb, R.G., North American recent soft-shelled turtles (Family Trionychidae), Univ. Ks. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 13, 431–611, 1962.

Westerga, J., and Gramsbergen, A., Changes in the electromyogram of two major hindlimb muscles during locomotor development in the rat, Exp. Brain Res., 92, 479–488, 1993.

Westneat, M.W., Feeding, function, and phylogeny: analysis of historical biomechanics in labrid fishes using comparative methods, Syst. Biol., 44, 361–383, 1995.

Westneat, M.W., and Walker, J.A., Motor patterns of labriform locomotion: Kinematic and electromyographic analysis of pectoral fin swimming in the labrid fish Gomphosus varius, J. Exp. Biol., 200, 1881–1893, 1997.

Willey, J.S., and Blob, R.W., Tail kinematics of juvenile common snapping turtles during aquatic walking, J. Herpetol., 38, 360–369, 2004.

Wren, K., Claussen, D.L., and Kurz, M., The effects of body size and extrinsic mass on the locomotion of the ornate box turtle, Terrapene ornata, J. Herpetol., 32, 144–150, 1998.

Wyneken, J., Sea turtle locomotion: Mechanisms, behavior, and energetics, in The Biology of Sea Turtles, P.L. Lutz and J.A. Musick (eds.), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1997, 165–198.

Zangerl, R., The turtle shell, in Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 1, Morphology A, C. Gans, A.d’A. Bellairs, and T.S. Parsons, (eds.), London: Academic Press, 1969, 311–339.

Zani, P.A., and Claussen, D.L., Voluntary and forced locomotion in juvenile and adult painted turtles, Chrysemys picta, Copeia, 1994, 466–471, 1994.

Zani, P.A., Gottschall, J.S., and Kram, R., Giant Galapagos tortoises walk without inverted pendulum mechan- ical-energy exchange, J. Exp. Biol., 208, 1489–1494, 2005.

Zernicke, R.F., and Smith, J.L., Biomechanical insights into neural control of movement, in Handbook of Physiology Section 12: Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems, L.B. Rowling and J.T. Shepherd (eds.), New York: American Physiological Society, 1996, 293–330.

Zug, G.R., Buoyancy, locomotion, morphology of the pelvic girdle and hind limb, and systematics of cryptodiran turtles, Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich., 142, 1–98, 1971.

7 Cervical Anatomy and

Function in Turtles

Anthony Herrel, Johan Van Damme, and Peter Aerts

Contents

7.1

Introduction.........................................................................................................................

 

163

7.2

Materials and Methods........................................................................................................

165

 

7.2.1

Anatomical Studies..................................................................................................

165

 

7.2.2

Kinematic Analyses..................................................................................................

165

7.3

Results..................................................................................................................................

 

166

 

7.3.1

Osteology..................................................................................................................

166

 

7.3.2

Cervical Joints..........................................................................................................

167

 

7.3.3

Musculature..............................................................................................................

169

 

 

7.3.3.1

Chelodina....................................................................................................

169

 

 

7.3.3.2

Apalone.......................................................................................................

175

 

7.3.4

Neck Movements......................................................................................................

179

 

 

7.3.4.1 Neck Retraction and Cervical Mobility in Apalone ferox..........................

179

 

 

7.3.4.2 Kinematics of Snorkeling in C. longicollis.................................................

180

7.4

Discussion............................................................................................................................

 

181

 

7.4.1

Vertebral Structure...................................................................................................

181

 

7.4.2

Cervical Musculature...............................................................................................

181

 

7.4.3

Movement Patterns...................................................................................................

183

Acknowledgments..........................................................................................................................

 

184

References.......................................................................................................................................

 

 

184

7.1Introduction

Being mobile is an essential requirement for any animal. Not only do animals need to move about to find food or partners, they also need to be able to escape potential predators (Irschick & Garland, 2001). Interestingly, some vertebrate groups appear to have sacrificed part of their mobility in response to predation pressure by the development of a robust armored body (e.g., pangolins, glyptodonts, turtles, and so on). Although body armor can provide an animal with an adequate protection against predators, it also dramatically reduces its locomotor ability and overall agility (Wren et al., 1998; Zani et al., 2005). Thus, many armored vertebrates have specialized on eating non-mobile food items like plants, or clumped food sources such as ants or termites (King, 1996). However, some groups have developed an alternative strategy for capturing elusive prey by developing long, mobile appendages such as projectile tongues (Deban et al, 1997; Herrel et al., 2000) or a long neck (Gans, 1992). For instance, many semi-aquatic and aquatic turtles have developed remarkably long necks that are used to capture elusive prey under water (Pritchard, 1984).

Although the turtle carapace provides an excellent defense against predators, it is imperative that the long neck and head can be protected as well. To do so, the head-neck system needs to be withdrawn within the margins of the bony shell. This can be done in one of two ways: in the

163

164

Biology of Turtles

mid-sagittal plane (vertically), which involves the retraction of the head and neck within the bony shell, or laterally (in the horizontal plane), where the neck is folded between the dorsal and ventral rim of the bony shell. In this case, the head and neck do remain partially exposed in the outer carapacial chamber in front of the pectoral girdle (Van Damme et al., 1995). This difference in the mode of neck retraction in turtles has often been used as an important character for the subdivision of the class Testudines into the subclasses Cryptodira and Pleurodira. Whereas cryptodires retract their head-neck system in the vertical plane, pleurodires do so in the horizontal plane (Figure 7.1).

Accurate control of the neck during rapid movements associated with escape head retraction and prey capture appears crucial for turtles. However, the turtle neck is a highly complex multi-jointed system, consisting of eight cervical vertebrae, the head, and the body and a large number of muscles that span anywhere from one to over eight joints. The control of such a multi-joint system with a large number of degrees of freedom appears inherently complex. Although some ways to facilitate the control of the system have been identified previously (Aerts et al., 2001), a better understanding of the detailed structure and function of the musculo-skeletal elements of the cervical system is essential to gain better insight into the control of the cervical system. Moreover, large differences in vertebral structure, in the morphology of associated musculature, and in the control of the cra- nio-cervical system can be expected for turtles that retract their necks predominantly in either the horizontal or vertical plane. Unfortunately, previous authors have described differences in vertebral structure between cryptrodiran and pleurodiran turtles predominantly from a taxonomic standpoint (Vaillant, 1881; Williams, 1950; but see Weisgram & Splechtna 1990, 1992). Thus, it remains presently unclear whether different functional capacities (i.e., ranges of mobility) are associated with either morphology. Without this type of information, our understanding of the control of the craniocervical system in cryptodiran and pleurodiran turtles must, unfortunately, remain limited.

The aim of the present chapter is to give a detailed morphological description of the cervical system in pleurodiran and cryptodiran turtles. In doing so, our emphasis will be on the functional consequences of differences in morphology in the two groups. Additionally, some previously unpublished data on the actual kinematics of neck movement will be presented to highlight the consequences of morphological differences in the two groups. As our type representatives for cryptodiran and pleurodiran turtles we have chosen the genera Chelodina and Apalone. The Australian pleurodiran turtles of the genus Chelodina are renowned for their extreme elongated neck. Because the neck is longer than the carapace, these turtles are also known as snake-necked turtles. These animals use their elongated neck both for quick strikes at prey and for snorkeling, thus aspirating air from the surface without exposing more than the tip of the snout. Species from this genus will be used as a typical representative of the pleurodiran condition. Turtles of the genus Apalone, also known as the soft-shelled turtles, represent the cryptodiran counterpart of Chelodina. These animals are also characterized by an extremely elongated neck, often longer than the carapace itself (Ernst & Barbour, 1989). Soft-shell turtles typically live in shallow water and will use their elongate neck to breathe at the water surface with minimal movement. Moreover, just like Chelodina,

Cryptodira

Pleurodira

Figure 7.1  Schematic representation of the two major modes of head retraction in turtles. Left, lateral view on the cervical system in a cryptodire. In cryptodires, the head is retracted in the vertical plane. Right, dorsal view on the cervical system in a pleurodire. Here the head is retracted in the horizontal plane.

Cervical Anatomy and Function in Turtles

165

members of the genus Apalone are voracious predators that will actively strike at elusive prey under water (Dalrymple, 1977; Ernst & Barbour, 1989).

7.2Materials and Methods

7.2.1Anatomical Studies

The anatomy of the cervical vertebrae, joint structures, and cervical musculature of Chelodina longicollis was studied by means of dissection of a preserved specimen (K.B.I.N., R.G.nr.4566). Additionally, an adult C. reimani (cadaver obtained through the commercial pet trade) was used to study the cervical anatomy. One individual of the species Apalone ferox and one A. spiniferus were dissected to investigate the anatomy of the cervical system in a typical cryptodire. Animals were obtained through the commercial pet trade, sacrificed by means of an overdose of Nembutal and preserved in a 10% aqueous formaldehyde solution for 24 hours. Next, animals were rinsed extensively and transferred to a 70% aqueous ethanol solution.

Cervical morphology was studied by means of dissections. In the morphological descriptions, vertebrae are indicated by capital C or D (cervical and dorsal vertebrae, respectively) followed by their serial number. C1 is closest to the head. Joints are labeled by the number of the adjacent vertebrae: C(n)-(n − 1), with n the number of the more caudal vertebra and (n − 1) the number of the more cranial one as suggested by Heidweiller (1991). For example, the joint between vertebra 5 and 6 is defined as “joint C6-5.”

7.2.2Kinematic Analyses

To study the kinematics of snorkeling, two live adult specimens of Chelodina longicollis were used for the experiments (one female of 730 g, 18 cm carapace length and one male of 520 g, 15 cm carapace length). The animals were obtained with the help of the Antwerp Zoo and were housed in a glass aqua-terrarium on a 12-hour light/dark cycle. One live Apalone ferox and one live A. spiniferus, obtained through the commercial pet trade, were used to study the mobility of the cervical vertebrae in these long-necked cryptodires. The water temperature was kept at 28°C for all species. Twice a week, the turtles were fed with meat, mice, and small invertebrates (crickets, grasshoppers).

Snorkeling movements (neck movements in the vertical plane) of C. longicollis were recorded by means of cineradiography in lateral view using a Polydoros 80S generator equipped with a Siemens Siregraph D40 x-ray flash apparatus at 66 kV. The digital cineradiographic recordings (depending on the sequence 4 or 6 frames per second, Fluorospot H) were printed on Scopix laserfilm (35 × 43 cm) by means of an Agfa laser printer. During the recordings, the animals were restrained by means of a body-shaped corselet. This corselet was mounted under the water surface on a fixed frame.

The sequences were projected frame by frame and digitized. Digitization of the position of the joints allowed the calculation of several kinematical parameters (joint angles, elevation of the head, head position) in a turtle-bound frame. The same terminology of joint rotations is used as described for the neck movements in the horizontal plane, i.e., clockwise rotations are defined as positive.

Mobility of the cervical vertebrae in A. ferox and A. spiniferus was studied by means of CT scanning. The animal was anesthetized by means of intramuscular injection of Ketamine (150 mg/ kg body mass). CT scans were recorded using a CT-highlight Advantage scanner at the University of Antwerp Hospital. Of 10 different static neck positions, ranging from fully extended to fully retracted, 3-s long recordings resulting in 1.5 mm thick slices through the vertebral column were made at 140 kV, 140 mA. Scans were printed on Scopix LT2B-100 NIF x-ray film.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]