Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Учебное пособие 2112

.pdf
Скачиваний:
2
Добавлен:
30.04.2022
Размер:
6.1 Mб
Скачать

Issue № 1(29), 2016 ISSN 2075-0811

2.4. Bending resistance of the joints considering the tensile strength [8]:

MN ,Rd M pl,Rd ,b

1 Nsd / Nb, pl

,

(9)

1 0,5(A 2btf ) / A

where Mpl, Rd. b is a plastic moment of the support slab of the column:

 

Mpl,Rd,b Wb fyep / Mo ;

 

(10)

Wb is an inertia moment of the support slab of the column; γМо = 1,1; fyер is the bending resistance of the support slab material; A is the area of the transverse section of the column; Nb, pl is a calculation longitudinal strength of the column base: Nb, pl = Afy / γMo; fy is the compressive resistance of the support slab material; tf is the thickness of the cap of the column section.

2.5. Determining the rigidity of the compressed concrete [7]:

Kc Ec

leff ,cpbeff ,c

,

1, 275

 

 

where Ec is the elasticity modulus of concrete foundations;

leff ,ср tf 2,5tep.

2.6. Determining the rigidity of a bended support slab [7, 8]: –– without considering extra forces:

 

 

 

 

 

 

l

 

t3

 

 

K

epb

0,425E

ep

eff

eff

 

;

m3

 

 

 

 

 

–– considering extra forces:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

l

eff

t3

 

 

K

 

0,85E

 

 

 

eff

 

,

 

 

 

m3

 

 

epb

ep

 

 

where Eep is the elasticity modulus of a steel support slab.

2.7. Determining the rigidity of the tensile bolts [7]: –– without considering extra forces:

Kb Eb 2Ab ;

Lbef

–– without extra forces:

Kb Eb 1,6Ab ,

Lbef

where Ab is the area of the longitudinal section of bolts.

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

101

Scientific Herald of the Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Construction and Architecture

The equivalence rigidity of the i-th row of bolts [6, 7]:

Kt,i

 

1

 

.

1

 

 

1

 

Kepb,i

 

Kb,i

 

 

 

 

 

2.8. Determining vertical shears of the connections (Fig. 6.) [6, 9]:

t,l MSd NSd zc,r ;

zKt,l

MSd NSd zt,l .

c,r zKc,r

а)

b)

(16)

(17)

(18)

Fig. 6. Mechanical model of the joint:

а) at different signs of efforts in the connections (detachment of the slab from the foundation); b) at identical ones (compressed ones)

2.9. Determining the rotational angle of the support slab (Fig. 6а) [9]:

 

t,l

 

c,r

 

1

MSd NSd zt,l

 

MSd NSd zc,r

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

z

z

z2

Kc,r

Kt,l

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(19)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.10. Determining the rotational resistance [5, 9]: –– at a small eccentricity e < zc, r:

S

r

 

e

 

 

 

z2

 

 

;

e e

 

 

1

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

(20)

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kc,l

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kc,r

 

102

Issue № 1(29), 2016

ISSN 2075-0811

–– at a large eccentricity e > zc, r:

S

r

 

e

 

 

 

z2

 

 

,

e e

 

 

1

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

(21)

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kt,l

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kc,r

 

where Kc, l and Kc, r are the rigidities of the components under tension and shear; μ is the coefficient considering a reduction in the rigidity of a plastic range providing that a bending moment is 2/3 larger than the bending of the components:

1,5 M Sd 2,7 ;

M Rd

e0 Kc zc,r Kt zt,l .

Kc Kt

3. Sample calculation. The base of the column is to be computed: the thickness of the support slab is tep = 28 mm, thickness and width of a section of the column tf = 10 mm, bf = 200 mm, twc = 6 mm, hwc = 380 mm; bolts Ab = 560 mm2, fub = 192 N/mm2, FSd = 95 kN; MSd = 170 kN·m; the height of the plate of the concrete foundation h = 1200 mm (Fig. 7).

а)

b)

Fig. 7. Distribution of bolts in the column base: а) a cut; b) a plan

The results of the calculation are specified in Table.

103

Scientific Herald of the Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Construction and Architecture

Table

 

 

 

 

Calculation data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tensile resistance of the joints of the

F1,t,Rd

min Ft,Rd ,1;

Ft,Rd ,3 min 230750; 193536

first row of bolts

193,5 kN FSd

95 kN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tensile resistance of the joints of the

F2,t,Rd

min Ft,Rd ,1;

Ft,Rd ,3; Fbwt,Rd

 

second row of bolts

min 319555; 337882;

 

193536 193,5

kN FSd 95 kN

 

 

Bending resistance of the column base

M Rd Ft,Rd

rb Aeff

f j rc

 

 

 

181,6 kN m MSd

170 kN m

 

 

Bending resistance of the joint consi-

M N ,Rd

M pl,Rd ,b

 

 

 

 

1 Nsd / Nb, pl

 

 

 

1 0,5(A 2bt f ) / A

 

dering the tensile force

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

173,7 kN m MSd

 

170 kN m

 

 

 

 

 

MSd NSd zc,r

 

 

0, 46 mm ;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t,l

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

zKt,l

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Displacements of the support slab

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MSd NSd zt,l

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c,r

 

 

0,13 mm

 

 

 

 

 

 

zKc,r

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rotational angle of the support slab

 

 

t,l

 

c,r

 

 

0,46 0,13 1,36 10 3

 

 

 

 

 

z

 

 

 

 

 

z

 

 

 

 

 

 

434,12

 

 

 

 

 

Sr

 

 

e

 

 

 

 

 

z2

 

 

 

10

Nmm / radian

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,95 10

Rotational resistance

e

e0

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kt,l

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kc,r

 

 

 

 

Conclusions

1.A method of the evaluation of the rigidity and strength of joints of metal columns with foundations under the effect of a bending moment and axial vertical force considering the rigidity and strength of members of a joint.

2.A degree of accuracy of calculations using the component method in compliance with the Eurocode 3.

3.The previously suggested [6] method of predicting the operation of members of a joint due to more accurate determination of the sizes and shapes of elastic and plastic compressive zones depending on the models suggested in [5, 6, 9].

References

1.Evrokod-2 (TKP EN 1992). Proektirovanie zhelezobetonnyx konstrukcij. — CEN Bryussel', 2004.

2.Evrokod-3 (TKP EN 1993-1-8). Proektirovanie stal'nyx konstrukcij. Ch. 1—8. — CEN Bryussel', 2005.

3.Ledenyov, V. V. Raschet boltovyx soedinenij s uchetom dopolnitel'nyx sil / V. V. Ledenyov, T'yu Txi Xoang An' // Stroitel'naya mexanika i konstrukcii. — 2013. — № 2 (7). — S. 80—85.

4.SNiP 53-100-2010. Stal'nye konstrukcii / Gosstroj Rossii. — M.: GUP CPP, 2010. — 225 s.

104

Issue № 1(29), 2016

ISSN 2075-0811

5.James, A. S. Ultimate Strength Prying Models for Bolted T-stub Connections / A. S. James // Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction. — 2002. — № 3. — P. 136—147.

6.Kestutis, U. Component Method Extension to Steel Beam-to-Beam and Beam-to-Column Knee Joints under Bending and Axial Strengths / Kestutis Urbonas, Alfonsas Daniūnas // Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. — 2005. — № 11 (3). — P. 217—224.

7.Latour, M. Column-Base Plate Joints under Monotonic Loads: Theoretical and Experimental Analysis / Massimo Latour, Vincenzo Piluso, Gianvittorio Rizzano // 7th International Workshop on Connections in Steel Structures. — Timisoara, 2012. — 12 pp.

8.Thornton, W. A. Prying Action — a General Treatment / W. A. Thornton // Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction. — 1985. — Vol. 22, № . 2. — P. 67—75.

9.Wald, F. Component Method for Steel Column Bases / F. Wald, Z. Sokol, C. M. Steenhuis // Heron — Steel Column Bases. — 2008. — Vol. 53, № 1 (2). — 20 pp.

105

Scientific Herald of the Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Construction and Architecture

CITY PLANNING, PLANNING OF VILLAGE SETTLEMENT

UDC 711(620)

A. S. R. Ahmad1

EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY

FOR NEW TOWNS CONSTRUCTION IN EGYPT

(USING THE EXAMPLE OF BORG EL ARAB)

Izhevsk State University Named after Mikhail Kalashnikov

Russia, Izhevsk, tel.: +7-929-276-02-09, e-mail: dr.arch.amira@hotmail.com 1PhD student of Dept. of Industrial and Civil Construction

Statement of the problem. In 1974 a new strategy of social and economic development of Egypt was introduced that involved the design of new residential towns as well as the development of industry and agriculture, especially in deserts. This paper deals with the concept of architectural and planning development of new towns in Egypt. A hypothesis is made that the design of new towns will help to deliver on post-war challenges of social and economic development of Egypt.

Results. The research uncovered important facts about Egypt’s new towns, (Borg El Arab as an example). The research also suggests recommendations for helping Egyptian new towns further achieve the national goals of their construction.

Conclusions. Based on the analysis a conclusion was made that Egyptian new towns have the ability to deliver on the goals of post war socio-economic development. The achievement of Egypt’s new towns goals took more time than had been planned due to the exaggeration in estimating growth rates of new towns.

Keywords: industrial town, new town, urban development, socio-economic development.

Introduction

Egypt’s existing towns are facing a number of critical issues. New towns are flagship of Egypt’s cutting-edge urban construction. Egypt’s current urban construction policies are expected to deliver on the post-war social and economic goals.

October treaty of 1974 [1] saw a comprehensive perspective of Egypt’s social and economic development embraced by the state. It included the construction of new residential areas as well as development of industry and agriculture especially in deserts. This study looks into the concept of architectural and planning development of Egypt’s new towns.

© Ahmad А. S. R., 2016

106

Issue № 1(29), 2016

ISSN 2075-0811

We are analyzing the conditions of Egypt’s new towns and hypothesizing that the construction of new towns would help address some of the issues concerning Egypt’s social and economic development.

The structure of the national strategy of the construction of Egypt’s new towns has been investigated by N.E. Mahmoud, A.Shehata, J.Hobson, M.Assas, K.Galal, M.Zahran etc. The issues facing Egypt’s towns have been dealt with by M. Madbouly, H. Helbawi, A. Soliman, M.H. Saudi, A.A. Sheta, etc. In spite of a lot effort made to address the problem, it is still running deep and studies of new towns for accomplishing Egypt’s post-war social and economic agenda are of paramount importance.

Following the end of the war in October, 1973, Egypt’s national strategic plan was in place that was aimed at social and economic development and included the construciton of urban areas. It saw the construction of new independent towns (such as Madīnat al-ʿĀshir min Ramaḍān, 1977, El-Sadat, 1976, Borg El Arab, 1979) with an economic and industrial base, residential areas and housing systems [2].

1. The causes of the construction of new towns in Egypt were overpopulation of existing towns, their massive deterioration, protection of agricultural lands from existing growing cities [3] (Fig. 1), increasingly worse housing conditions (Fig. 2), environmental issues, concentration of economic activities and services in existing towns.

Fig. 1. Growth of towns on agricultural land. Cairo, Egypt [3]

107

Scientific Herald of t he Voronezh State University o f Architecture and Civil Engineering. Construction and Architecture

Fig. 2. Degrading housing conditions in large cities

East of Alexandria, E gypt [4]

Up until 1973 all th e towns and residential areas wer e centered along the Nile valley. Following the end of the war ew towns were constru cted in the desert (Fig. 3) rich in deposits and accounting for 96% of Egy pt’s territory as part of social and economic evelopment. This strategy is in agreem nt with the goal to relocate the pop ulation fro m the Nile valley [5] and results in a shift of economic activities and urban services enabling to ma ke the most of the country’s territory.

Fig. 3. Egypt’s new to ns are indicated with red d ots (2014)

Source: http://ww w.newcities.gov.eg/english/New_Communities/default.aspx

108

Issue № 1(29), 2016

ISSN 2075-0811

2. Analysis of current conditions of Egypt’s new and existing towns. One of the major problems facing Egypt’s existing towns is overpopulation. In 2008 the average population density in Cairo was as large as 42286,7 inhabitants per km2. It should be noted that the population of Cairo in 2008 increased by 7 985,549 inhabitants and in Alexandria the density was about 2503,8 inhabitants per km2 [8]. In Borg El Arab in 2014 the population was 150 000 inhabitants with the average density of about 775 inhabitants per km2.

As far as degradation of existing towns is concerned, it should be noted that Cairo is the capital of Egypt and Middle East and Africa’s largest city. The metropolitan area of Cairo is the 16th largest in the world. Set in the Nile valley, the metropolitan area of Cairo is 86 369 km2 with the population of 19 439 541 as of 2011. The metropolitan area of Cairo includes five cities making up a huge agglomeration (Cairo, El Giza, 6th of October City, Helwan, Shoubra El Khaima). Alexandria (Fig. 4) is Egypt’s second largest city after Cairo with the population of 4,5 million, ~120 km of the Mediterranean coast in the central eastern part of the country [9]. This city is also one of the largest in the Mediterranean coast: the metropolitan area of Alexandria is 2136,97 km2 [10]. The living conditions in large cities are degrading due to the following: inadequate funding; not enough trained urban construction and management staff; the government’s failure to control the growth of cities (Fig. 4) into nearby areas. Cairo’s old areas are not properly maintained and developed resulting in increasingly deteriorating housing and infrastructure [11]. Furthermore, overpopulation, unemployment and insufficient food supplies are all too common.

Fig. 4. Location of Alexandria, expansion into rural areas around the city, 2014.

Source: https://maps.google.ru/maps?hl=ru&tab=wl

109

Scientific Herald of the Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Construction and Architecture

3. Analysis of the developm ent of Borg El Arab. Borg El Arab is a new town [6, 7] (see Fig. 3). The construction of the city started in 1979. It was made part of the province of Alexandria a s decreed by the President on February 22, 1990.

The planning structure of Borg El Arab (Fig. 5) includes two residential areas. The first one in the North consists of four averagely and scarcely populated residential quarters. The second one in the South is divided into five averagely and scarcely populated living quarters. All of them are homes to educational, administrative and commercial institutions. Both residential areas a re along the main city road which runs throughout the length of the city. In the city centre there is a major commercial centre and large green areas. Industrial areas are located in five areas in the South East and North East of the city [1, 13].

The city with clear boundaries (Fig. 4) is located 7 kilometers away from the Mediterranean coast and about 5 km away from Alexandria-Matruh road in the North of the cit y. In the South there is a settlement named after Murbarak populated by young specialists and the city of El-Hamam in the West. The city’s clear boundaries are marked with the Borg El Arab airport, Alexandria-Matruh road in the West, Namam Burgas road in the East, AlexandriaMatruh road in the North and the International Road, which is under construction, in the South.

Agricultural region

Seventh

Fifth quarter

Fourth

 

 

quarter

 

 

quarter

Urban services

Collector

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collector

 

Ninth

Eighth

Sixth quarter

quarter

quarter

 

 

Industrial areas

First

Industrial areas

quarter

 

Commercial centre

Third Second quarter quarter

Industrial areas

Industrial areas

North

Baheeg Canal

 

Borg El Arab,

 

International

Industrial areas

Airport

 

Fig. 5. Planning structure of Borg El Arab [13, p. 6]

110